LAIN-LAIN 1. ) Koh Suee Yan (No. K/P: 750610-01-6302/A2892842) ...Pempetisyen Isteri 2. ) Tee Chin Kok (No. K/P: 760219-10-6259/A3167564) ...Pempetisyen Suami
The husband failed to prove a material change in circumstances or exceptional circumstances to justify varying the consent Decree Nisi; he voluntarily accepted the decree and later incurred obligations, and his evidence of ongoing financial deterioration was insufficient; therefore sections 96 and 97 do not assist him and the application must be dismissed.
- Citation
- JA-33JP-460-05/2016 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Petitioner Wife: Koh Suee Yan; Petitioner Husband: Tee Chin Kok
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 23 February 2021
- Case Number
- JA-33JP-460-05/2016 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce Variation of Decree Nisi / Application to Vary Decree Nisi (post Decree Variation Hearing)
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Variation of Consent Order, Material Change of Circumstances, Custody and Maintenance, Enforcement of Decree, Costs
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Koh Suee Yan
Petitioner Wife
Tee Chin Kok
Petitioner Husband
Procedural Posture
Divorce Variation of Decree Nisi / Application to Vary Decree Nisi (post Decree Variation Hearing)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there was a material change in circumstances warranting variation of a consent Decree Nisi
- 2 Whether the consent order could be varied absent exceptional circumstances
- 3 Whether the wife breached the original decree by selling transferred matrimonial property
Ratio Decidendi
The husband failed to prove a material change in circumstances or exceptional circumstances to justify varying the consent Decree Nisi; he voluntarily accepted the decree and later incurred obligations, and his evidence of ongoing financial deterioration was insufficient; therefore sections 96 and 97 do not assist him and the application must be dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Enclosure 10 dismissed
- Costs of RM5,000 awarded against the Petitioner Husband (subject to allocator fee)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment