AUGUSTINE A/L T.K. JAMES 1. ) LIEW CHONG MIN 2. ) NG TUCK WENG 3. ) TAN KINV TAT
On the facts the court found the disputed post‑petition dispositions were made bona fide, in the ordinary course to pay genuine creditors and benefitted the general body of creditors; key respondents (Liew and certain solicitors) lacked knowledge of the winding up petition; solicitors Wong & Ting were not 'officers'...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- WA-28PW-218-08/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Petitioner: Lim Wee Ngeh Painting Sdn Bhd; Company / Respondent: Began Construction Sdn Bhd; Applicant (liquidator): Augustine James a/l TK James; 1st Respondent: Liew Chong Min; 2nd Respondent: Ng Tuck Weng; 3rd Respondent (advocates & Solicitors): Messrs Wong & Ting; Respondent (former Solicitor): Tan Kinv Tat / The Law Chambers of Tan Kinv Tat
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 13 June 2022
- Case Number
- WA-28PW-218-08/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Post‑winding Up Applications: Declarations Under Companies Act (validation and Recovery) / Hearing on Liquidator's Motions for Declarations and Validation; Judgment on Consolidated Matters After Winding Up Order
- Outcome
- Liquidator's motions in WA‑28PW‑217‑08/2021 and WA‑28PW‑218‑08/2021 dismissed; validation granted in WA‑28PW‑352‑12/2021 for specified post‑petition dispositions; ancillary recovery assistance ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Void Dispositions After Presentation of Winding Up Petition (s.472 Companies Act 2016), Misfeasance and Breach of Trust (s.541 Companies Act 2016), Validation of Dispositions by Court, Liability of Officers and Solicitors, Undue Preference
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lim Wee Ngeh Painting Sdn Bhd
Petitioner
Began Construction Sdn Bhd
Company / Respondent
Augustine James a/l TK James
Applicant (liquidator)
Liew Chong Min
1st Respondent
Ng Tuck Weng
2nd Respondent
Messrs Wong & Ting
3rd Respondent (advocates & Solicitors)
Tan Kinv Tat / The Law Chambers of Tan Kinv Tat
Respondent (former Solicitor)
Procedural Posture
Post‑winding Up Applications: Declarations Under Companies Act (validation and Recovery) / Hearing on Liquidator's Motions for Declarations and Validation; Judgment on Consolidated Matters After Winding Up Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether dispositions of company funds made after presentation of winding up petition are void under s.472 Companies Act 2016
- 2 Whether payments made after presentation amounted to misapplication/misfeasance or undue preference such that s.541 remedies apply
- 3 Whether the Court should validate the post‑petition dispositions as bona fide and for benefit of general body of creditors
Ratio Decidendi
On the facts the court found the disputed post‑petition dispositions were made bona fide, in the ordinary course to pay genuine creditors and benefitted the general body of creditors; key respondents (Liew and certain solicitors) lacked knowledge of the winding up petition; solicitors Wong & Ting were not 'officers' under s.541 and thus not liable under that provision; accordingly liquidator's recovery motions in PW217 and PW218 were dismissed, while validation orders were granted in PW352 for the specified payments; an order was made for Wong & Ting to assist recovery of RM125,000 held by Registrar of Unclaimed Monies to be repaid to the liquidator.
Court Disposition
Liquidator's motions in WA‑28PW‑217‑08/2021 and WA‑28PW‑218‑08/2021 dismissed; validation granted in WA‑28PW‑352‑12/2021 for specified post‑petition dispositions; ancillary recovery assistance ordered.
Orders
- Dismissed Notice of Motion in enclosure 1 of WA‑28PW‑217‑08/2021 and WA‑28PW‑218‑08/2021 with no order as to costs.
- Ordered Messrs Wong & Ting to claim and assist the Liquidator in claiming RM125,000 currently with the Registrar of Unclaimed Monies and, upon receipt, repay that sum to the Liquidator.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment