PEMIUTANG PENGHAKIMAN 1. ) Menara Jutamas Sdn Bhd 2. ) Amcorp Global Limited (dahulu dikenali sebagai Tee Land Limited) PENGHUTANG PENGHAKIMAN Abdul Kadir Bin Haji Sheikh Fadzir
The High Court held the Bankruptcy Order valid and dismissed the debtor's challenge: a change of company name did not require leave under O.46 r.2(1)(b); the Interim Order expired on 7.1.2025 and the creditors' meeting on 4.2.2025 was invalid so no VA operated to prevent bankruptcy; the debtor failed to establish ability to pay; and the creditors had exhausted available enforcement against the wound‑up principal by filing a proof of debt, entitling them to proceed against the guarantor.
- Citation
- WA-29NCC-928-07/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Judgment Debtor: Abdul Kadir bin Haji Sheikh Fadzir; Judgment Creditor: Menara Jutamas Sdn Bhd; Judgment Creditor: Amcorp Global Limited (formerly Tee Land Limited)
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 12 November 2025
- Case Number
- WA-29NCC-928-07/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy / Insolvency / High Court Judgment (appeal to Court of Appeal Filed)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; Bankruptcy Order upheld
- Legal Topics
- Voluntary Arrangement (va), Interim Order (io), Creditor's Petition, Leave to Commence Bankruptcy Against Guarantor, Change of Company Name, Winding‑up and Enforcement Exhaustion
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Abdul Kadir bin Haji Sheikh Fadzir
Judgment Debtor
Menara Jutamas Sdn Bhd
Judgment Creditor
Amcorp Global Limited (formerly Tee Land Limited)
Judgment Creditor
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy / Insolvency / High Court Judgment (appeal to Court of Appeal Filed)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Order 46 r.2(1)(b) RoC required prior leave for a mere change of company name
- 2 Whether a Voluntary Arrangement and Interim Order remained valid when creditors' meeting was held after IO expiry
- 3 Whether the debtor demonstrated ability to pay under s.6(3) IA
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court held the Bankruptcy Order valid and dismissed the debtor's challenge: a change of company name did not require leave under O.46 r.2(1)(b); the Interim Order expired on 7.1.2025 and the creditors' meeting on 4.2.2025 was invalid so no VA operated to prevent bankruptcy; the debtor failed to establish ability to pay; and the creditors had exhausted available enforcement against the wound‑up principal by filing a proof of debt, entitling them to proceed against the guarantor.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; Bankruptcy Order upheld
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs of RM10000.00 to be paid by the Judgment Debtor to the Judgment Creditors
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment