David Thomas Matthews, Tina Ann Francis and Jason Tan Jen Hua for the Petitioner in the Petition and the 1st Defendant in the Originating Summons and mentioning on behalf of Amanah Raya Berhad as personal presentative representing the 5th R
The OS for a Fortuna injunction was dismissed because the petition had already been advertised/gazetted and no preservable status quo or irreparable harm was established, and the OS was an abuse aimed at altering board composition; conversely the petition for winding up succeeded on just and equitable grounds because there was a complete and irretrievable breakdown of trust and confidence among key shareholders and directors making continued co-existence impossible, therefore winding up and appointment of a liquidator was ordered with specified costs.
- Citation
- SAMAN PEMULA NO. WA-24NCC-387-09/202 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Petitioner: TER CHIN HENG; 1st Respondent: CHIPTAR HOLDINGS SDN BHD; 2nd Respondent / Plaintiff (os): TER THIAN TIN; 3rd Respondent: TER WEI HONG; 4th Respondent: LI YUHUA; 5th Respondent: PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF TEH YU CHAI @ TER SWEE LEONG
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 21 March 2022
- Case Number
- SAMAN PEMULA NO. WA-24NCC-387-09/202 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Companies (winding Up) Petition and Originating Summons / Heard Together and Final Judgment on Petition and OS
- Outcome
- Originating Summons dismissed; Companies (Winding-Up) Petition allowed and Company ordered to be wound up
- Legal Topics
- Winding Up (just and Equitable), Fortuna Injunction (restraint on Presentation/advertisement of Winding Up Petition), Abuse of Court Process, Breakdown of Mutual Trust and Confidence, Appointment of Liquidator, Costs Orders
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
TER CHIN HENG
Petitioner
CHIPTAR HOLDINGS SDN BHD
1st Respondent
TER THIAN TIN
2nd Respondent / Plaintiff (os)
TER WEI HONG
3rd Respondent
LI YUHUA
4th Respondent
PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF TEH YU CHAI @ TER SWEE LEONG
5th Respondent
Procedural Posture
Companies (winding Up) Petition and Originating Summons / Heard Together and Final Judgment on Petition and OS
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a Fortuna injunction should be granted to restrain the winding-up petition and its advertisement/gazette
- 2 Whether alternative remedies (Rights Issue Suit and Fiduciary Suit) render injunctive relief appropriate
- 3 Whether there is just and equitable ground to wind up the company due to breakdown of mutual trust and confidence
Ratio Decidendi
The OS for a Fortuna injunction was dismissed because the petition had already been advertised/gazetted and no preservable status quo or irreparable harm was established, and the OS was an abuse aimed at altering board composition; conversely the petition for winding up succeeded on just and equitable grounds because there was a complete and irretrievable breakdown of trust and confidence among key shareholders and directors making continued co-existence impossible, therefore winding up and appointment of a liquidator was ordered with specified costs.
Court Disposition
Originating Summons dismissed; Companies (Winding-Up) Petition allowed and Company ordered to be wound up
Orders
- Winding up order granted in terms of paragraph 1 of Enclosure 1: Chiptar Holdings Sdn Bhd to be wound up
- Ralph Ravin Ratnaswany appointed as liquidator of Chiptar Holdings Sdn Bhd
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment