Daryl Kong for the Applicant [Messrs Edwin Lim & Suren] LAIN-LAIN 1. ) Louis Chong for the Petitioner [Messrs Zaid Ibrahim & Co.] 2. ) Priscilla Deng for the Official Receiver [Jabatan Insolvensi Malaysia]
The court found that the petitioner and its solicitors failed to inform the company's solicitors and the Court of Appeal of the pending winding up petition and order while an appeal was active, which amounted to concealment and lack of good faith constituting an abuse of process; that abuse constituted special circumstances under section 492 justifying a stay of the winding up order until disposal of the appeal, together with specified restrictions and costs.
- Citation
- POST (WINDING-UP) NO. WA-28PW-111-04/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Applicant / Contributory: Yeoh William; Company / Subject of Winding Up: Yang Zhong Capital Sdn Bhd; Petitioner: Fuji Xerox Asia Pacific Pte Ltd; Liquidator / Official Receiver: Official Receiver
- Court
- WINDING-UP
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 25 June 2021
- Case Number
- POST (WINDING-UP) NO. WA-28PW-111-04/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Winding Up / Stay Application Under Companies Act 2016 / Judgment on Stay Application Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- Application granted in part; stay of winding up order until disposal of the Company's appeal; costs awarded to applicant.
- Legal Topics
- Winding Up, Stay of Winding Up Order, Abuse of Process, Service of Process, Special Circumstances Test
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Yeoh William
Applicant / Contributory
Yang Zhong Capital Sdn Bhd
Company / Subject of Winding Up
Fuji Xerox Asia Pacific Pte Ltd
Petitioner
Official Receiver
Liquidator / Official Receiver
Procedural Posture
Winding Up / Stay Application Under Companies Act 2016 / Judgment on Stay Application Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to grant a stay of the winding up order under section 492 of the Companies Act 2016
- 2 Whether the petitioner concealed material facts and abused court process by not informing the company's solicitors and the Court of Appeal of the winding up petition/order
- 3 Whether service on the company secretary rather than the company's solicitors affected validity or fairness of the petition
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the petitioner and its solicitors failed to inform the company's solicitors and the Court of Appeal of the pending winding up petition and order while an appeal was active, which amounted to concealment and lack of good faith constituting an abuse of process; that abuse constituted special circumstances under section 492 justifying a stay of the winding up order until disposal of the appeal, together with specified restrictions and costs.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part; stay of winding up order until disposal of the Company's appeal; costs awarded to applicant.
Orders
- Stay of the Winding Up Order until disposal of Appeal No. W-04(IM)(NCVC)-238-08/2020
- No dealings in the assets of the Company in any way whatsoever without the consent of this Court
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment