1. ) Abc 2. ) Def Jkl

1. ) Abc 2. ) Def Jkl

The Defendant's declaration as biological father did not constitute a material change sufficient to vary or discharge the interim injunction because the child had been validly adopted under Adoption Act 1952 (s9) which extinguished the father's rights; the Defendant failed to show access would be in the child's best interests and did not rebut factual findings of risk (including an admission to abduct the child); accordingly the application to review/vary the injunction was dismissed and the injunction maintained.

Citation
BA-22F-3-11/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Parties
Plaintiff: ABC; Plaintiff: DEF; Defendant: JKL
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Malaysia
Judgment Date
12 January 2024
Case Number
BA-22F-3-11/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Procedural Posture
Civil (family) / Interlocutory Application to Review/vary Interim Injunction (urgent Application) — Dismissed at High Court Judgment
Outcome
Application dismissed with no order as to costs; interim injunction remains in force
Legal Topics
Interim Injunction, Adoption Order, Parental Rights, Paternity/dna Declaration, Visitation/access
Source Language
Malay/English
Family Law Adoption Law Civil Procedure Child Welfare Interim Injunction Adoption Order Parental Rights Paternity/dna Declaration +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

ABC

Plaintiff

DEF

Plaintiff

JKL

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil (family) / Interlocutory Application to Review/vary Interim Injunction (urgent Application) — Dismissed at High Court Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a declaratory order of biological paternity constitutes a material change of circumstances warranting variation/discharge of an interim injunction
  2. 2 Whether a biological father's rights survive a lawful adoption under the Adoption Act 1952
  3. 3 Whether visitation/access should be granted to the biological father in the face of a subsisting adoption order and existing interlocutory injunction

Ratio Decidendi

The Defendant's declaration as biological father did not constitute a material change sufficient to vary or discharge the interim injunction because the child had been validly adopted under Adoption Act 1952 (s9) which extinguished the father's rights; the Defendant failed to show access would be in the child's best interests and did not rebut factual findings of risk (including an admission to abduct the child); accordingly the application to review/vary the injunction was dismissed and the injunction maintained.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with no order as to costs; interim injunction remains in force

Orders

  • Application dated 11 November 2023 dismissed
  • No order as to costs