ABD KHALID BIN HAMID

ABD KHALID BIN HAMID

Court accepted guilty plea and mitigation but found offences serious: elderly victims targeted by deceptive modus operandi in separate incidents at different times/places with different victims; one-transaction rule inapplicable; public interest and deterrence justify consecutive custodial sentences. Imposed 6 years' imprisonment for each robbery: first sentence to run from arrest date (07/01/2026), second to commence after completion of first; exhibits handed to prosecution for disposal or return to owners.

Citation
RA-62RS-1-01/2026 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
Parties
Prosecutor: Public Prosecutor; Defendant: Abd Khalid bin Hamid (590610-02-5823)
Court
Sessions Court
Jurisdiction
Malaysia
Judgment Date
6 February 2026
Case Number
RA-62RS-1-01/2026 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Appeal Against Sentence Following Guilty Plea (s.305) / Sentencing on Facts
Outcome
Defendant convicted on guilty pleas and sentenced to imprisonment
Legal Topics
Robbery (s.392 Penal Code), Guilty Plea Mitigation (s.305 Cpc), Consecutive Vs Concurrent Sentences, Identification (kawad Cam), Public Interest and Deterrence, Exhibit Disposal
Source Language
Malay/English
Criminal Law Sentencing Robbery (s.392 Penal Code) Guilty Plea Mitigation (s.305 Cpc) Consecutive Vs Concurrent Sentences Identification (kawad Cam) Public Interest and Deterrence Exhibit Disposal

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Public Prosecutor

Prosecutor

Abd Khalid bin Hamid (590610-02-5823)

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Appeal Against Sentence Following Guilty Plea (s.305) / Sentencing on Facts

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the guilty plea sufficiently mitigates sentence
  2. 2 Whether sentences should run consecutively or concurrently
  3. 3 Appropriate weight to public interest and deterrence

Ratio Decidendi

Court accepted guilty plea and mitigation but found offences serious: elderly victims targeted by deceptive modus operandi in separate incidents at different times/places with different victims; one-transaction rule inapplicable; public interest and deterrence justify consecutive custodial sentences. Imposed 6 years' imprisonment for each robbery: first sentence to run from arrest date (07/01/2026), second to commence after completion of first; exhibits handed to prosecution for disposal or return to owners.

Court Disposition

Defendant convicted on guilty pleas and sentenced to imprisonment

Orders

  • RA-62RS-1-01/2026: Imprisonment for 6 years commencing from date of arrest 07/01/2026
  • RA-62RS-2-01/2026: Imprisonment for 6 years to commence after completion of sentence in RA-62RS-1-01/2026 (sentences to run consecutively)