ABD KHALID BIN HAMID

ABD KHALID BIN HAMID

Court accepted guilty pleas and mitigation but found aggravating factors (targeting of elderly victims, deceptive modus operandi, separate incidents in time and place and different victims) required deterrent punishment; applied one-transaction/totality principles and discretion to order consecutive sentences; sentenced defendant to 6 years imprisonment for each robbery count, first term to run from date of arrest and second to run consecutively after completion of first; exhibits handed to prosecution for disposal or return to owners.

Citation
RA-62RS-2-01/2026 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
Parties
Prosecutor: Pendakwa Raya; Defendant: Abd Khalid bin Hamid
Court
Sessions Court
Jurisdiction
Malaysia
Judgment Date
6 February 2026
Case Number
RA-62RS-2-01/2026 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
Procedural Posture
Criminal Robbery (section 392 Penal Code) / Sentencing After Guilty Plea
Outcome
Defendant convicted on guilty pleas and sentenced to imprisonment.
Legal Topics
Robbery, Plea of Guilty, Concurrent Vs Consecutive Sentences, Mitigation and Aggravation, Public Interest in Sentencing
Source Language
Malay/English
Criminal Law Criminal Procedure Sentencing Robbery Plea of Guilty Concurrent Vs Consecutive Sentences Mitigation and Aggravation Public Interest in Sentencing

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Pendakwa Raya

Prosecutor

Abd Khalid bin Hamid

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Robbery (section 392 Penal Code) / Sentencing After Guilty Plea

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether guilty pleas materially mitigate sentence
  2. 2 Appropriate quantum of sentence for robbery against elderly victims
  3. 3 Whether sentences should run consecutively or concurrently given separate incidents

Ratio Decidendi

Court accepted guilty pleas and mitigation but found aggravating factors (targeting of elderly victims, deceptive modus operandi, separate incidents in time and place and different victims) required deterrent punishment; applied one-transaction/totality principles and discretion to order consecutive sentences; sentenced defendant to 6 years imprisonment for each robbery count, first term to run from date of arrest and second to run consecutively after completion of first; exhibits handed to prosecution for disposal or return to owners.

Court Disposition

Defendant convicted on guilty pleas and sentenced to imprisonment.

Orders

  • RA-62RS-1-01/2026: Imprisonment for 6 years commencing from date of arrest (7/01/2026).
  • RA-62RS-2-01/2026: Imprisonment for 6 years to run consecutively after completion of sentence in RA-62RS-1-01/2026.