1. ) ABDULLAH BIN ATAN 2. ) MOHAMMAD REZA GHAEM PANAH NEZAMALI 3. ) HASSAN JAVADIPIROUZ AVAZALI 4. ) PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 1. ) PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 2. ) MAHMOOD YARY MOHAMMAD (PASSPORT NO. H 20682101S)
Section 180(4) CPC must be read harmoniously with section 37(da) DDA: once credible evidence establishes actual possession and the statutory weight is met, the court may invoke the rebuttable presumption of trafficking under section 37(da) to make out a prima facie case; appellants Abdullah, Reza and Hasan had possession and statutory weight established so their convictions and death sentences are affirmed; prosecution's appeal against Mahmood fails because possession was not proven against him and his acquittal is affirmed.
- Citation
- 05(M)-56-02/2019(J); DIDENGAR BERSAMA 05(M)-205-09/2018(W); 05(M)-206-09/2018(W); 05(LB)-207-09/2018(W) (Mahkamah Persekutuan)
- Parties
- Appellant: Abdullah bin Atan; Appellant: Mohammad Reza Ghaem Panah Nezamali; Appellant: Hassan Javadipirouz Avazali; Respondent: Public Prosecutor; Appellant: Public Prosecutor; Respondent: Mahmood Yary Mohammad
- Court
- M
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 26 August 2020
- Case Number
- 05(M)-56-02/2019(J); DIDENGAR BERSAMA 05(M)-205-09/2018(W); 05(M)-206-09/2018(W); 05(LB)-207-09/2018(W) (Mahkamah Persekutuan)
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Federal Court Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeals by Abdullah bin Atan, Mohammad Reza Ghaem Panah Nezamali and Hassan Javadipirouz Avazali dismissed; their convictions and death sentences affirmed. Prosecution's appeal against Mahmood Yary Mohammad dismissed; Mahmood's acquittal and discharge affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Prima Facie Test, Presumption of Trafficking, Burden of Proof, Possession, Section 180 Criminal Procedure Code, Section 37(da) Dangerous Drugs Act 1952
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Abdullah bin Atan
Appellant
Mohammad Reza Ghaem Panah Nezamali
Appellant
Hassan Javadipirouz Avazali
Appellant
Public Prosecutor
Respondent
Public Prosecutor
Appellant
Mahmood Yary Mohammad
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Federal Court Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the statutory presumption of trafficking in section 37(da) DDA constitutes credible evidence for the prosecution to make out a prima facie case under section 180(4) CPC
- 2 Whether convictions of Abdullah, Reza and Hasan are safe on the facts
- 3 Whether the acquittal of Mahmood was sustainable
Ratio Decidendi
Section 180(4) CPC must be read harmoniously with section 37(da) DDA: once credible evidence establishes actual possession and the statutory weight is met, the court may invoke the rebuttable presumption of trafficking under section 37(da) to make out a prima facie case; appellants Abdullah, Reza and Hasan had possession and statutory weight established so their convictions and death sentences are affirmed; prosecution's appeal against Mahmood fails because possession was not proven against him and his acquittal is affirmed.
Court Disposition
Appeals by Abdullah bin Atan, Mohammad Reza Ghaem Panah Nezamali and Hassan Javadipirouz Avazali dismissed; their convictions and death sentences affirmed. Prosecution's appeal against Mahmood Yary Mohammad dismissed; Mahmood's acquittal and discharge affirmed.
Orders
- Dismiss appeals of Abdullah, Reza and Hasan and affirm convictions and sentences imposed by the courts below
- Dismiss prosecution's appeal and affirm Court of Appeal order of acquittal and discharge of Mahmood Yary Mohammad
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment