ABDULLAH BIN KHALID
Prosecution failed to prove a prima facie case under Section 506 because the complainant's credibility was materially undermined by contradictions and vested interest, the prosecution did not produce the first police report and failed to call other eyewitnesses whose absence warranted adverse inferences under s114(g), and the investigation was defective; accordingly the accused was discharged and acquitted without being called to defend.
- Citation
- NA-83-420-03/2021 (Mahkamah Majistret)
- Parties
- Prosecution: PENDAKWA RAYA; Defendant: ABDULLAH BIN KHALID
- Court
- Magistrates' Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 22 December 2023
- Case Number
- NA-83-420-03/2021 (Mahkamah Majistret)
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Offence Under Section 506 Kanun Keseksaan (intimidation) / Close of Prosecution's Case (prima Facie Assessment)
- Outcome
- Accused discharged and acquitted; released from the charge under Section 506 Kanun Keseksaan without being called to enter defence.
- Legal Topics
- Intimidation (threats), Prima Facie Assessment, Credibility of Witnesses, Failure to Call Corroborating Witnesses, Defective Investigation, Evidence Act Presumptions (s114(g))
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
PENDAKWA RAYA
Prosecution
ABDULLAH BIN KHALID
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Offence Under Section 506 Kanun Keseksaan (intimidation) / Close of Prosecution's Case (prima Facie Assessment)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution proved a prima facie case under Section 506 Kanun Keseksaan
- 2 Whether the sole complainant (SP1) was a credible and reliable witness
- 3 Whether failure to call other eyewitnesses and to produce the first police report fatally undermined the prosecution case
Ratio Decidendi
Prosecution failed to prove a prima facie case under Section 506 because the complainant's credibility was materially undermined by contradictions and vested interest, the prosecution did not produce the first police report and failed to call other eyewitnesses whose absence warranted adverse inferences under s114(g), and the investigation was defective; accordingly the accused was discharged and acquitted without being called to defend.
Court Disposition
Accused discharged and acquitted; released from the charge under Section 506 Kanun Keseksaan without being called to enter defence.
Orders
- Accused Abdullah Bin Khalid discharged and acquitted without being called to enter defence
- Accused released and freed from the charge dated 16 January 2024 (Order of Majistret Syed Farid bin Syed Ali)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment