1. GAN CHON TAT (No. K/P: 590916-03-5397) 2. AONG CHAI NGAA (No. K/P: 370302-03-5072) Pentadbir besama harta Pesaka Gan Soon Cheow (No. K/P: 1510525), Simati 1. GAN JIN SIM @ GAN GIM SIM (No. K/P: 320605-03-5058 / 3756622) 2. GAN JIN SIM @
Plaintiffs were held to have abused the court process; assessment was validly conducted by affidavit given plaintiffs’ agreement and case management powers; defendants proved loss and entitlement to damages for abuse of process, and awards were made: general damages RM50,000 each, special damages (legal fees) RM142,878 split equally (RM71,439 each), aggravated damages RM50,000 each, exemplary damages RM50,000 each; costs of this application RM20,000 subject to taxation.
- Citation
- DA-22NCvC-28-06/2018 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff 1: GAN CHON TAT; Plaintiff 2: AONG CHAI NGAA; Defendant 1: GAN JIN SIM @ GAN GIM SIM; Defendant 2: GAN JIN SIM @ GAN GIM SIM (Pentadbir Harta Pesaka Gan Lai Kim)
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 9 January 2022
- Case Number
- DA-22NCvC-28-06/2018 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit (guaman Sivil) / Assessment of Damages Post Judgment (taksiran Ganti Rugi)
- Outcome
- Assessment allowed; judgment for Defendants on damages for abuse of process with specific monetary awards and costs order
- Legal Topics
- Abuse of Process, Assessment of Damages, Aggravated Damages, Exemplary Damages, Costs, Vexatious Litigant, Use of Affidavit Evidence in Assessment
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
GAN CHON TAT
Plaintiff 1
AONG CHAI NGAA
Plaintiff 2
GAN JIN SIM @ GAN GIM SIM
Defendant 1
GAN JIN SIM @ GAN GIM SIM (Pentadbir Harta Pesaka Gan Lai Kim)
Defendant 2
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit (guaman Sivil) / Assessment of Damages Post Judgment (taksiran Ganti Rugi)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiffs abused the process of the court (vexatious litigant) and are liable in damages
- 2 Whether assessment of damages may proceed by affidavit evidence rather than oral testimony
- 3 Quantum and heads of damages recoverable for abuse of process (general, special/legal costs, aggravated, exemplary)
Ratio Decidendi
Plaintiffs were held to have abused the court process; assessment was validly conducted by affidavit given plaintiffs’ agreement and case management powers; defendants proved loss and entitlement to damages for abuse of process, and awards were made: general damages RM50,000 each, special damages (legal fees) RM142,878 split equally (RM71,439 each), aggravated damages RM50,000 each, exemplary damages RM50,000 each; costs of this application RM20,000 subject to taxation.
Court Disposition
Assessment allowed; judgment for Defendants on damages for abuse of process with specific monetary awards and costs order
Orders
- Plaintiffs shall pay Defendant 1 general damages of RM50,000.00
- Plaintiffs shall pay Defendant 2 general damages of RM50,000.00
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment