1. ) XXXX 2. ) SA'DIAH BINTI SAADON 1. ) XXXX 2. ) IBRAHIM BIN AB GHANI
Both appeals are dismissed. The High Court held the LSJ's allowance to produce the forensic report was an interlocutory ruling made in the course of trial and not appealable; alternatively, the LSJ did not err in exercising discretion to admit the report given stage of trial and absence of real prejudice. Appeal against refusal to stay was nugatory and the Record of Appeal in Appeal No.12 was defective for failing to include pleadings. Plaintiffs were granted liberty to recall witnesses regarding the forensic report. Costs awarded: RM1,000 for Appeal No.11 and RM2,000 for Appeal No.12.
- Citation
- JB-12ANCvC-12-12/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff/appellant: Safirul bin Sabri (by his mother Sa'diah binti Sa'adon); Plaintiff/appellant: Sa'diah binti Sa'adon; Defendant/respondent: Wan Zeity Mazura bin Wan Sahak (representing estate of Iskandar bin Ibrahim, deceased); Defendant/respondent: Ibrahim bin Ab Ghani
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 10 June 2024
- Case Number
- JB-12ANCvC-12-12/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (interlocutory) From Sessions Court Running Down/motor Accident Action / Interlocutory Appeals Heard During Trial; Plaintiff's Case Ongoing (six Witnesses Testified)
- Outcome
- Both appeals dismissed; decision of the Learned Sessions Judge upheld; Plaintiffs granted liberty to recall witnesses in relation to the forensic report
- Legal Topics
- Admissibility of Expert Evidence, Extension of Time, Appealability of Interlocutory Rulings, Stay of Proceedings, Case Management, Pre Trial Disclosure Obligations, Order 34 Rule 10 ROC 2012, Order 3 Rule 5 ROC 2012, Order 92 Rule 4 ROC 2012, Order 55 Rule 5 ROC 2012
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Safirul bin Sabri (by his mother Sa'diah binti Sa'adon)
Plaintiff/appellant
Sa'diah binti Sa'adon
Plaintiff/appellant
Wan Zeity Mazura bin Wan Sahak (representing estate of Iskandar bin Ibrahim, deceased)
Defendant/respondent
Ibrahim bin Ab Ghani
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (interlocutory) From Sessions Court Running Down/motor Accident Action / Interlocutory Appeals Heard During Trial; Plaintiff's Case Ongoing (six Witnesses Testified)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge's ruling allowing a late-produced forensic report is appealable at interlocutory stage
- 2 Whether the trial judge erred in admitting the forensic report produced after trial commenced
- 3 Whether Defendants should have complied with Order 34 r.10(1)(b)(i) versus seeking extension under Order 3 r.5
Ratio Decidendi
Both appeals are dismissed. The High Court held the LSJ's allowance to produce the forensic report was an interlocutory ruling made in the course of trial and not appealable; alternatively, the LSJ did not err in exercising discretion to admit the report given stage of trial and absence of real prejudice. Appeal against refusal to stay was nugatory and the Record of Appeal in Appeal No.12 was defective for failing to include pleadings. Plaintiffs were granted liberty to recall witnesses regarding the forensic report. Costs awarded: RM1,000 for Appeal No.11 and RM2,000 for Appeal No.12.
Court Disposition
Both appeals dismissed; decision of the Learned Sessions Judge upheld; Plaintiffs granted liberty to recall witnesses in relation to the forensic report
Orders
- Appeal No. JB-12ANCVC-11-10/2023 dismissed with costs RM1,000 and liberty for Plaintiffs to recall any of their witnesses regarding Defendant's forensic report
- Appeal No. JB-12ANCVC-12-12/2023 dismissed with costs RM2,000; Record of Appeal found defective for failing to include pleadings
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment