1. ) Bukit Tinggi Hospital Sdn Bhd 2. ) Dr Prashanth Nambiar a/l Padmanabhan 1. ) Navin Sharma a/l Karam Chand 2. ) Saroop Rampal a/p Hardyal Rampal
Aggravated damages must be expressly pleaded, particularised and proved; an estate may only recover aggravated damages for aggravating conduct that occurred while the deceased was alive and sentient and perceived such conduct; post‑death conduct and litigation strategy cannot form the basis for aggravated damages and should be addressed by costs or procedural sanctions; loss of dependency must be supported by cogent evidence of actual contribution, and where such evidence is absent the dependency award must be set aside. Applying these principles the Court adjusted several quantum items and set aside the RM700,000 aggravated damages and the RM176,280 dependency award.
- Citation
- B-02(NCvC)(W)-1482-09/2023 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Parties
- Defendant/appellant: Bukit Tinggi Hospital Sdn Bhd; Defendant/appellant: Dr Prashanth Nambiar A/L Padmanabhan; Plaintiff/appellant (administrator of Estate): Navin Sharma A/L Karam Chand; Plaintiff/appellant (administrator of Estate): Saroop Rampal A/P Hardyal Rampal
- Court
- NCvC
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 23 September 2025
- Case Number
- B-02(NCvC)(W)-1482-09/2023 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Procedural Posture
- Medical Negligence; Estate and Dependency Claims Under Civil Law Act 1956 / Appeal to Court of Appeal on Quantum (liability Accepted by Parties)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part and dismissed in part. High Court awards varied: some special damages reduced, pain and suffering reduced, dependency and aggravated damages set aside, trial costs increased, interest rate reduced.
- Legal Topics
- Aggravated Damages, General Damages, Special Damages, Loss of Dependency, Pleadings, Trial Costs, Interest
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bukit Tinggi Hospital Sdn Bhd
Defendant/appellant
Dr Prashanth Nambiar A/L Padmanabhan
Defendant/appellant
Navin Sharma A/L Karam Chand
Plaintiff/appellant (administrator of Estate)
Saroop Rampal A/P Hardyal Rampal
Plaintiff/appellant (administrator of Estate)
Procedural Posture
Medical Negligence; Estate and Dependency Claims Under Civil Law Act 1956 / Appeal to Court of Appeal on Quantum (liability Accepted by Parties)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether aggravated damages may be claimed by an estate for conduct occurring after the deceased's death
- 2 Whether aggravated damages must be specifically pleaded and particularised
- 3 Whether the estate proved loss of dependency under s.7 CLA
Ratio Decidendi
Aggravated damages must be expressly pleaded, particularised and proved; an estate may only recover aggravated damages for aggravating conduct that occurred while the deceased was alive and sentient and perceived such conduct; post‑death conduct and litigation strategy cannot form the basis for aggravated damages and should be addressed by costs or procedural sanctions; loss of dependency must be supported by cogent evidence of actual contribution, and where such evidence is absent the dependency award must be set aside. Applying these principles the Court adjusted several quantum items and set aside the RM700,000 aggravated damages and the RM176,280 dependency award.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part and dismissed in part. High Court awards varied: some special damages reduced, pain and suffering reduced, dependency and aggravated damages set aside, trial costs increased, interest rate reduced.
Orders
- Item 1 (hospital charges) reduced from RM49,601.50 to RM33,000.00
- Item 2 (funeral and memorial services) RM15,000.00 maintained
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment