MOHD FIRDAUS BIN ISMAIL [ ]
The Court accepted the trial judge's credibility findings regarding SP4, found the contemporaneous police documents and exhibit identifications established possession and an unbroken chain of custody, concluded appellants failed to rebut the statutory presumption of trafficking on the balance of probabilities and therefore affirmed convictions and sentences.
- Citation
- W-05(SH)-312-07/2022 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Parties
- Appellant: Aizuddin Bin Azizan; Appellant: Mohd Firdaus bin Ismail; Respondent: Public Prosecutor
- Court
- SH
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 25 September 2025
- Case Number
- W-05(SH)-312-07/2022 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment (appeal Dismissed)
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed; convictions and sentences affirmed; cross-appeal by prosecution dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Trafficking, Possession, Statutory Presumption of Trafficking, Chain of Custody, Credibility of Witnesses, Search and Seizure, Malicious Prosecution Allegation
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Aizuddin Bin Azizan
Appellant
Mohd Firdaus bin Ismail
Appellant
Public Prosecutor
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment (appeal Dismissed)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether prosecution proved possession and trafficking beyond reasonable doubt under Dangerous Drugs Act 1952
- 2 Whether statutory presumption of trafficking under s37(da)(vi) was rebutted on balance of probabilities
- 3 Credibility and reliability of the police raiding officer (SP4)
Ratio Decidendi
The Court accepted the trial judge's credibility findings regarding SP4, found the contemporaneous police documents and exhibit identifications established possession and an unbroken chain of custody, concluded appellants failed to rebut the statutory presumption of trafficking on the balance of probabilities and therefore affirmed convictions and sentences.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed; convictions and sentences affirmed; cross-appeal by prosecution dismissed.
Orders
- The appellants' appeals are dismissed
- Convictions and sentences entered by the High Court are affirmed (life imprisonment from date of arrest and 15 strokes of rotan for each appellant)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment