[Timbalan (TPR), Jabatan Peguam Negara] 1. ) Muhammad Fazrin Bin Kamarolzaman 2. ) Mohamad Syafiq Bin Dzulkarnain
Court accepted prosecution's lawful introduction of an alternative charge and convicted Accused 1 on the alternative charge under the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952; having weighed mitigation (guilty plea, first offender, age) against public interest and drug quantity/type, court sentenced Accused 1 to 12 years' imprisonment from date of arrest and 10 strokes, to run concurrently with related cases; prosecution informed court it would not proceed against Accused 2 and, exercising the court's discretion under s254(3) KPJ and relevant authority, the court directed discharge amounting to acquittal (A&D) for Accused 2.
- Citation
- CB-45A-9-03/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Prosecution: Pendakwa Raya; Accused 1: Muhammad Fazrin bin Kamarolzaman; Accused 2: Mohamad Syafiq bin Dzulkarnaian
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 8 February 2024
- Case Number
- CB-45A-9-03/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal (narcotics) / Trial — Sentencing and Discontinuance of Prosecution
- Outcome
- Accused 1 convicted on alternative charge; sentenced to 12 years' imprisonment and 10 strokes, concurrent with related cases. Accused 2 discharged and acquitted (A&D) pursuant to s254(3) KPJ.
- Legal Topics
- Alternative Charges (section 166 Kpj), Amendment of Charges (section 158 Kpj), Prosecutorial Discretion (section 376 Kpj; Article 145(3)), Discharge Vs Acquittal (section 254(3) Kpj), Withdrawal of Remaining Charges (section 171 Kpj), Sentencing Principles for Drug Offences
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pendakwa Raya
Prosecution
Muhammad Fazrin bin Kamarolzaman
Accused 1
Mohamad Syafiq bin Dzulkarnaian
Accused 2
Procedural Posture
Criminal (narcotics) / Trial — Sentencing and Discontinuance of Prosecution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an alternative charge under section 166 KPJ may be validly introduced during trial and its relation to section 158 KPJ
- 2 Scope of court's power to amend or add charges under sections 158 and 173(h) KPJ
- 3 Extent of prosecutorial discretion to prefer, amend or discontinue charges under section 376 KPJ and Article 145(3) Federal Constitution
Ratio Decidendi
Court accepted prosecution's lawful introduction of an alternative charge and convicted Accused 1 on the alternative charge under the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952; having weighed mitigation (guilty plea, first offender, age) against public interest and drug quantity/type, court sentenced Accused 1 to 12 years' imprisonment from date of arrest and 10 strokes, to run concurrently with related cases; prosecution informed court it would not proceed against Accused 2 and, exercising the court's discretion under s254(3) KPJ and relevant authority, the court directed discharge amounting to acquittal (A&D) for Accused 2.
Court Disposition
Accused 1 convicted on alternative charge; sentenced to 12 years' imprisonment and 10 strokes, concurrent with related cases. Accused 2 discharged and acquitted (A&D) pursuant to s254(3) KPJ.
Orders
- Accused 1: sentenced to 12 years' imprisonment from date of arrest 02.11.2021 and 10 strokes; sentences to run concurrently with cases CB-45-5-03/2022, CB-45-6-03/2022 and CB-45-13-08/2022.
- Accused 2: prosecution discontinued and accused discharged amounting to an acquittal (A&D) under section 254(3) KPJ.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment