AMBANK (M) BERHAD 1. ) STARFOAM & LATEX INDUSTRY SDN BHD 2. ) NG BOON TOUNG 3. ) JI KIM CHUAN 4. ) LEE TEONG PENG 5. ) DANNY TAN HOCK KEONG
Plaintiff established a prima facie case supported by executed facility and guarantee agreements and a contractual certificate of indebtedness; without‑prejudice communications were inadmissible; defendants' allegations were unsupported general denials and did not raise bona fide triable issues; Defendant 5's failure to file an affidavit amounted to acceptance of Plaintiff's averments; summary judgment therefore entered for Plaintiff for RM2,113,221.83 with contractual default interest and costs on indemnity basis.
- Citation
- WA-22NCC-845-12/2025 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: AMBANK (M) BERHAD; Defendant 1: STARFOAM & LATEX INDUSTRY SDN BHD; Defendant 2: NG BOON TOUNG; Defendant 3: JI KIM CHUAN; Defendant 4: LEE TEONG PENG; Defendant 5: DANNY TAN HOCK KEONG
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 22 April 2026
- Case Number
- WA-22NCC-845-12/2025 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Commercial Debt Enforcement Summary Judgment Application / Application for Summary Judgment Under Order 14 Kaedah‑kaedah Mahkamah 2012 Filed and Determined
- Outcome
- Summary judgment entered for Plaintiff against Defendants 1, 2, 3 and 5.
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Guarantees and Indemnities, Without Prejudice Communications, Conclusive Evidence Certificate, Default Interest, Failure to File Affidavit
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
AMBANK (M) BERHAD
Plaintiff
STARFOAM & LATEX INDUSTRY SDN BHD
Defendant 1
NG BOON TOUNG
Defendant 2
JI KIM CHUAN
Defendant 3
LEE TEONG PENG
Defendant 4
DANNY TAN HOCK KEONG
Defendant 5
Procedural Posture
Civil Commercial Debt Enforcement Summary Judgment Application / Application for Summary Judgment Under Order 14 Kaedah‑kaedah Mahkamah 2012 Filed and Determined
Legal Issues
- 1 Admissibility of without prejudice communications
- 2 Effect of failure to file affidavit in response
- 3 Allegation of unequal bargaining power/unequal bargaining position
Ratio Decidendi
Plaintiff established a prima facie case supported by executed facility and guarantee agreements and a contractual certificate of indebtedness; without‑prejudice communications were inadmissible; defendants' allegations were unsupported general denials and did not raise bona fide triable issues; Defendant 5's failure to file an affidavit amounted to acceptance of Plaintiff's averments; summary judgment therefore entered for Plaintiff for RM2,113,221.83 with contractual default interest and costs on indemnity basis.
Court Disposition
Summary judgment entered for Plaintiff against Defendants 1, 2, 3 and 5.
Orders
- Summary judgment under Order 14 KM 2012 entered for Plaintiff against Defendants 1, 2, 3 and 5 for RM2,113,221.83.
- Amount to carry continuous default interest at the contractual rate from date of default until full settlement.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment