AMBANK(M) BERHAD 1. ) PRECIOUS CONCRETE SDN BHD 2. ) C&L MINERALS SDN BHD 3. ) LAW THIEN LOY 4. ) CHUAH CHONG EE 5. ) CHOO KHEN LON
The Plaintiff proved entitlement to summary judgment: the Facility Agreement defaults, formal notices and a Certificate of Indebtedness were issued and unexplained by Defendants, the continuing guarantor clauses in the Guarantee and Indemnity bind the 2nd–5th Defendants despite resignation or rescheduling, and no manifest error in the certificate was shown; therefore summary judgment is entered against the 2nd–5th Defendants and the claim against the 1st Defendant is struck out (company wound up).
- Citation
- WA-22NCC-301-05/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: AMBANK (M) BERHAD; 1st Defendant: PRECIOUS CONCRETE SDN BHD; 2nd Defendant: C&L MINERALS SDN BHD; 3rd Defendant: LAW THIEN LOY; 4th Defendant: CHUAH CHONG EE; 5th Defendant: CHOO KHEN LON
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 19 November 2024
- Case Number
- WA-22NCC-301-05/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Suit – Summary Judgment Application Under Order 14 / Judgment (summary Judgment Granted)
- Outcome
- Summary judgment entered for Plaintiff against 2nd to 5th Defendants; claim against 1st Defendant struck out with liberty to file afresh (company wound up).
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Guarantee and Indemnity, Certificate of Indebtedness, Contract Variation (rescheduling), Continuing Guarantor Liability, Termination of Loan Facilities
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
AMBANK (M) BERHAD
Plaintiff
PRECIOUS CONCRETE SDN BHD
1st Defendant
C&L MINERALS SDN BHD
2nd Defendant
LAW THIEN LOY
3rd Defendant
CHUAH CHONG EE
4th Defendant
CHOO KHEN LON
5th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Suit – Summary Judgment Application Under Order 14 / Judgment (summary Judgment Granted)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Plaintiff proved indebtedness and entitlement to summary judgment
- 2 Whether the Guarantee and Indemnity binds guarantors despite resignation or rescheduling
- 3 Whether the Certificate of Indebtedness is conclusive absent manifest error or fraud
Ratio Decidendi
The Plaintiff proved entitlement to summary judgment: the Facility Agreement defaults, formal notices and a Certificate of Indebtedness were issued and unexplained by Defendants, the continuing guarantor clauses in the Guarantee and Indemnity bind the 2nd–5th Defendants despite resignation or rescheduling, and no manifest error in the certificate was shown; therefore summary judgment is entered against the 2nd–5th Defendants and the claim against the 1st Defendant is struck out (company wound up).
Court Disposition
Summary judgment entered for Plaintiff against 2nd to 5th Defendants; claim against 1st Defendant struck out with liberty to file afresh (company wound up).
Orders
- Overdraft Facility: RM 425243.38 as at 30-04-2024 under account no. 8881045111674 together with default interest at 3.50% per annum (BLR based) from 01-05-2024 until full settlement
- Multi Trade (Trust Receipt) Facility: RM 3088933.23 as at 30-04-2024 together with interest calculated on principal RM 2776606.62 at 2.50% per annum (BLR based) and penalty interest at 1.00% per annum from 01-05-2024 until full settlement
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment