AMIRUL HAZWAN BIN ABDUL RAHMAN
The prosecution established all elements of Section 14(a) by credible, consistent testimony of the child victim corroborated by parents and police report; the accused's persistent denial and testimony of interested family members did not create a reasonable doubt; conviction under S14(a) and consequent sentence were...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- BC-62JSK-139-08/2022 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
- Parties
- Prosecution: PENDAKWA RAYA; Defendant: Amirul Hazwan bin Abd Rahman
- Court
- Sessions Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 29 July 2025
- Case Number
- BC-62JSK-139-08/2022 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Judgment and Sentencing (end of Defence)
- Outcome
- Convicted of one count under Section 14(a) Akta Kesalahan‑Kesalahan Seksual Terhadap Kanak‑Kanak 2017
- Legal Topics
- Conviction, Sentencing, Burden of Proof, Credibility, Reasonable Doubt, Interested Witness, Corroboration, Victim Impact Statement
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
PENDAKWA RAYA
Prosecution
Amirul Hazwan bin Abd Rahman
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Judgment and Sentencing (end of Defence)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether prosecution proved elements of Section 14(a) of the Sexual Offences Against Children Act 2017
- 2 Whether the defence raised a reasonable doubt at the conclusion of the trial
- 3 Credibility and competence of the child victim's testimony
Ratio Decidendi
The prosecution established all elements of Section 14(a) by credible, consistent testimony of the child victim corroborated by parents and police report; the accused's persistent denial and testimony of interested family members did not create a reasonable doubt; conviction under S14(a) and consequent sentence were therefore justified.
Court Disposition
Convicted of one count under Section 14(a) Akta Kesalahan‑Kesalahan Seksual Terhadap Kanak‑Kanak 2017
Orders
- Sentence: 6 years imprisonment from date of order
- Ordered to undergo rehabilitation counselling while incarcerated under Section 26
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment