ANTHONY JOHN DASON 1. ) WONG KEAN YEN 2. ) LIANG CHONG BENG (Rakan Kongsi Dalam Firma Messrs CB Liang, Ng & Co Dan Bekas Rakan Kongsi Dalam Firma Messrs Nga Hock Cheh & Co) 3. ) NG KWEE LAN (Rakan Kongsi Dalam Firma Messrs CB Liang, Ng & Co
The appointment letter established a contingency/champerty arrangement prohibited by s.112(1)(b) LPA and therefore the contract was illegal and void under s.24 Contracts Act; as a result the plaintiff had no cause of action and the writ and statement of claim were struck out as an abuse of process; defendant's application to cancel the writ is allowed with costs.
- Citation
- WA-B52NCvC-466-10/2024 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: ANTHONY JOHN DASON; Defendant 1: WONG KEAN YEN; Defendant 2: LIANG CHONG BENG; Defendant 3: NG KWEE LAN; Defendant 4: NGA HOCK CHEH; Defendant 5: NGA MEI YEN
- Court
- Sessions Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 30 April 2025
- Case Number
- WA-B52NCvC-466-10/2024 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Session Court / Strike Out Application Under Order 18 R19 (application to Cancel Writ and Statement of Claim)
- Outcome
- Defendant 1's application allowed; Writ and Statement of Claim dated 28/10/2024 struck out against Defendant 1 as an abuse of process; costs to Defendant 1.
- Legal Topics
- Contingency Fees, Champerty, Illegality of Contract, Abuse of Process, Costs
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
ANTHONY JOHN DASON
Plaintiff
WONG KEAN YEN
Defendant 1
LIANG CHONG BENG
Defendant 2
NG KWEE LAN
Defendant 3
NGA HOCK CHEH
Defendant 4
NGA MEI YEN
Defendant 5
Procedural Posture
Civil Session Court / Strike Out Application Under Order 18 R19 (application to Cancel Writ and Statement of Claim)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the retainer letter constituted an unlawful contingency/champerty agreement prohibited by s.112(1)(b) LPA
- 2 Whether an illegal contract renders the plaintiff without cause of action and the proceedings an abuse of process
- 3 Whether the court should strike out the writ and statement of claim under Order 18 r 19
Ratio Decidendi
The appointment letter established a contingency/champerty arrangement prohibited by s.112(1)(b) LPA and therefore the contract was illegal and void under s.24 Contracts Act; as a result the plaintiff had no cause of action and the writ and statement of claim were struck out as an abuse of process; defendant's application to cancel the writ is allowed with costs.
Court Disposition
Defendant 1's application allowed; Writ and Statement of Claim dated 28/10/2024 struck out against Defendant 1 as an abuse of process; costs to Defendant 1.
Orders
- Costs to Defendant 1
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment