TENGKU IZWAN SHAH BIN TENGKU AZMAN
The court held that sentencing must balance offender, victim and community interests, giving primacy to public interest, and that judicial independence requires courts not to be swayed by public opinion when determining appropriate sentences.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- AA-42H-13-06/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Appellant: Appellant; Respondent: Respondent
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 13 October 2025
- Case Number
- AA-42H-13-06/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal (sentence) / Judgment on Sentence Appeal
- Outcome
- Judgment delivered on 4 December 2025 applying sentencing principles as set out in the reasons.
- Legal Topics
- Principles of Sentencing, Public Interest Vs Offender Interest, Judicial Independence From Public Opinion
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Appellant
Appellant
Respondent
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal (sentence) / Judgment on Sentence Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate sentence balancing public interest, victim interest and offender interest
- 2 Whether sentencing may be influenced by public opinion or must resist such pressure
- 3 How the interest of the community weighs against individual mitigation factors
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that sentencing must balance offender, victim and community interests, giving primacy to public interest, and that judicial independence requires courts not to be swayed by public opinion when determining appropriate sentences.
Court Disposition
Judgment delivered on 4 December 2025 applying sentencing principles as set out in the reasons.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment