1. Ghazali bin Ahmad (Bapa sah kepada simati Nur Aimi Zahirah binti Ghazali) 2. Abdul Wahab bin Salleh (Bapa sah kepada simati Nurul Izzati binti Abdul Wahab) Aznum binti Abdul Rahman @ Abdul Mutalib
The High Court reversed the Sessions Court, finding that on the balance of probabilities the defendant driver shared liability with the deceased motorcyclist; liability was apportioned 50/50. Documentary and oral evidence of employment and monetary contribution by the deceased were admissible under the Evidence Act (s32(1)(b), s60(3), s136) and may be supported by presumptions (s114), entitling plaintiffs to loss of dependency damages. Funeral expenses were allowed. Quantum awards are subject to the apportionment of liability; counterclaim and set-off by defendant given effect. Interest and costs awarded.
- Citation
- AB - 12B NCVC - 15 - 08/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Defendant/appellant: Aznum binti Abdul Rahman @ Abdul Mutalib; Plaintiff/respondent: Ghazali bin Ahmad; Plaintiff/respondent: Abdul Wahab bin Salleh
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 18 September 2020
- Case Number
- AB - 12B NCVC - 15 - 08/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (motor Vehicle Negligence) / Appeal From Sessions Court; Judgment on Quantum and Liability by High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; Sessions Court decision reversed in part; plaintiffs' claims allowed and liability apportioned 50/50 between defendant and motorcyclist; counterclaim and set-off by defendant allowed in principle; interest and costs awarded
- Legal Topics
- Apportionment of Liability, Loss of Dependency, Bereavement, Funeral Expenses, Admissibility of Documents, Counterclaim and Set Off, Appellate Review of Factual Findings
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Aznum binti Abdul Rahman @ Abdul Mutalib
Defendant/appellant
Ghazali bin Ahmad
Plaintiff/respondent
Abdul Wahab bin Salleh
Plaintiff/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (motor Vehicle Negligence) / Appeal From Sessions Court; Judgment on Quantum and Liability by High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Sessions Court erred in finding no liability on the driver and in rejecting plaintiffs' documentary evidence of employment
- 2 Whether plaintiffs are entitled to loss of dependency damages given documentary and oral evidence and presumptions under the Evidence Act
- 3 Whether bereavement and funeral expenses are recoverable given statutory limits and absence of receipts
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court reversed the Sessions Court, finding that on the balance of probabilities the defendant driver shared liability with the deceased motorcyclist; liability was apportioned 50/50. Documentary and oral evidence of employment and monetary contribution by the deceased were admissible under the Evidence Act (s32(1)(b), s60(3), s136) and may be supported by presumptions (s114), entitling plaintiffs to loss of dependency damages. Funeral expenses were allowed. Quantum awards are subject to the apportionment of liability; counterclaim and set-off by defendant given effect. Interest and costs awarded.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; Sessions Court decision reversed in part; plaintiffs' claims allowed and liability apportioned 50/50 between defendant and motorcyclist; counterclaim and set-off by defendant allowed in principle; interest and costs awarded
Orders
- Liability apportioned 50% to defendant and 50% to the deceased motorcyclist
- Award to first plaintiff for loss of dependency RM96,000 (RM500 x16 years) subject to 50% liability
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment