ARIF SHAHRILFUDIN BIN AHMAD

ARIF SHAHRILFUDIN BIN AHMAD

Court imposed 10 years' imprisonment and 10 strokes because the offence involved sexual penetration of a 17‑year‑old by her father, representing a serious breach of parental trust and significant public harm; mitigation of family dependence did not outweigh aggravating factors and existing sentences for related offences.

Citation
AC-62JS-11-11/2025 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
Parties
Prosecution: Public Prosecutor; Defendant: Arif Shahrilfudin bin Ahmad
Court
Sessions Court
Jurisdiction
Malaysia
Judgment Date
27 February 2026
Case Number
AC-62JS-11-11/2025 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sexual Offence Under Section 377 C / Sentencing (notice of Appeal Filed)
Outcome
Defendant sentenced to 10 years' imprisonment and 10 strokes; sentence to run consecutively to other imprisonment terms; defendant filed a notice of appeal.
Legal Topics
Anal Intercourse, Sexual Assault of a Minor, Sentencing, Incest, Abuse of Parental Trust
Source Language
Malay/English
Criminal Law Sexual Offences Family Law Anal Intercourse Sexual Assault of a Minor Sentencing Incest Abuse of Parental Trust

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Public Prosecutor

Prosecution

Arif Shahrilfudin bin Ahmad

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Sexual Offence Under Section 377 C / Sentencing (notice of Appeal Filed)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Appropriate sentence for sexual penetration of a minor under Section 377C
  2. 2 Weighing mitigation (family dependence) against public interest and denunciation
  3. 3 Aggravating factor of perpetrator being the victim's parent

Ratio Decidendi

Court imposed 10 years' imprisonment and 10 strokes because the offence involved sexual penetration of a 17‑year‑old by her father, representing a serious breach of parental trust and significant public harm; mitigation of family dependence did not outweigh aggravating factors and existing sentences for related offences.

Court Disposition

Defendant sentenced to 10 years' imprisonment and 10 strokes; sentence to run consecutively to other imprisonment terms; defendant filed a notice of appeal.

Orders

  • Imprisonment for 10 years
  • Ten strokes of the rotan (whipping)