AZIE RAHIMEE BIN ABDULLAH

AZIE RAHIMEE BIN ABDULLAH

Accused's guilty plea was voluntary, facts and exhibits established elements of offences; under s305 KTJ conviction stands and appeal against conviction is barred; sentencing was within judicial discretion after weighing mitigation, aggravation and public interest; a custodial element (one month imprisonment) plus fines was a proportionate, non-excessive sentence given use of a dangerous extendable metal rod and property damage, therefore conviction and sentence are upheld.

Citation
DJ-83-690-12/2025 (Mahkamah Majistret)
Parties
Prosecutor: Pendakwa Raya; Accused: Azie Rahimee bin Abdullah
Court
Magistrates' Court
Jurisdiction
Malaysia
Judgment Date
16 December 2025
Case Number
DJ-83-690-12/2025 (Mahkamah Majistret)
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Conviction and Sentencing With Post Conviction Appeal
Outcome
conviction and sentence upheld
Legal Topics
Assault With Dangerous Weapon, Criminal Damage, Guilty Plea, Appeal Limitation Under S305 KTJ, Mitigation and Aggravation, Public Interest
Source Language
Malay/English
Criminal Law Procedure Sentencing Assault With Dangerous Weapon Criminal Damage Guilty Plea Appeal Limitation Under S305 KTJ Mitigation and Aggravation +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 17 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Pendakwa Raya

Prosecutor

Azie Rahimee bin Abdullah

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Conviction and Sentencing With Post Conviction Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether conviction can be appealed after a guilty plea under s305 KTJ
  2. 2 Appropriate sentence for causing hurt with a dangerous weapon (s324 Penal Code) and criminal damage (s427 Penal Code)
  3. 3 Weight to be given to guilty plea as mitigation

Ratio Decidendi

Accused's guilty plea was voluntary, facts and exhibits established elements of offences; under s305 KTJ conviction stands and appeal against conviction is barred; sentencing was within judicial discretion after weighing mitigation, aggravation and public interest; a custodial element (one month imprisonment) plus fines was a proportionate, non-excessive sentence given use of a dangerous extendable metal rod and property damage, therefore conviction and sentence are upheld.

Court Disposition

conviction and sentence upheld

Orders

  • Convicted under Section 324 Penal Code and Section 427 Penal Code
  • First offence: 1 month imprisonment from date of arrest and fine RM5000; in default of payment to undergo 5 months imprisonment