1. ) Good Quantum Sdn. Bhd. 2. ) Datuk Chang Kok Chuang 3. ) Right Development Activities Sdn. Bhd. Alliance Investment Bank Berhad
The Court held (i) the Court of Appeal did not find AIBB responsible for the Securities Commission's rejection and evidence of losses arising from that rejection is excluded from assessment; (ii) the phrase 'general damages' in the pleadings and Grounds of Judgment in the present case covers both pecuniary and non-pecuniary losses so evidence on both is admissible; and (iii) because the Liability Judgment ordering assessment of damages for breach of the collateral contract and for illegal/wrongful and negligent sale remains operative, the Assessing Party may adduce evidence in support of those three limbs although AIBB may still raise challenges as to locus standi, overlap and double...
- Citation
- WA-28PW-277-10/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff (original Action); Defendant (counterclaim): Alliance Investment Bank Berhad; 1st Defendant (original Action): Good Quantum Sdn Bhd; 2nd Defendant (original Action): Dato Hamzah bin Ghazali; 3rd Defendant (original Action); Plaintiff (counterclaim): Datuk Chang Kok Chuang; 4th Defendant (original Action): Wong Hon Keong; Plaintiff (counterclaim): Right Development Activities Sdn Bhd
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 6 January 2023
- Case Number
- WA-28PW-277-10/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Assessment of Damages Following Liability Judgment / Preliminary Issues Decision and Case Management for Assessment Hearing
- Outcome
- Preliminary issues decided: excluded evidence relating to losses from Securities Commission rejection; held general damages encompass pecuniary and non-pecuniary losses in this case; allowed assessment to proceed on three limbs subject to challenges; procedural timetable set.
- Legal Topics
- Assessment of Damages, Collateral Contract, General Damages, Wrongful/negligent Sale of Shares, Interpretation of Appellate Judgment, Locus Standi, Remoteness, Causation, Duty to Mitigate, Preliminary Issues
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alliance Investment Bank Berhad
Plaintiff (original Action); Defendant (counterclaim)
Good Quantum Sdn Bhd
1st Defendant (original Action)
Dato Hamzah bin Ghazali
2nd Defendant (original Action)
Datuk Chang Kok Chuang
3rd Defendant (original Action); Plaintiff (counterclaim)
Wong Hon Keong
4th Defendant (original Action)
Right Development Activities Sdn Bhd
Plaintiff (counterclaim)
Procedural Posture
Assessment of Damages Following Liability Judgment / Preliminary Issues Decision and Case Management for Assessment Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Court of Appeal made a finding that AIBB was responsible for Securities Commission's rejection of the PCB Restructuring Scheme and whether losses from that rejection can be included in assessment of damages
- 2 What is the meaning and ambit of 'general damages' awarded to Datuk Chang and RDA
- 3 Whether the Court can assess damages for sale of PCB Shares when transactional documents conferring beneficial ownership were declared invalid/ineffective by the Court of Appeal
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held (i) the Court of Appeal did not find AIBB responsible for the Securities Commission's rejection and evidence of losses arising from that rejection is excluded from assessment; (ii) the phrase 'general damages' in the pleadings and Grounds of Judgment in the present case covers both pecuniary and non-pecuniary losses so evidence on both is admissible; and (iii) because the Liability Judgment ordering assessment of damages for breach of the collateral contract and for illegal/wrongful and negligent sale remains operative, the Assessing Party may adduce evidence in support of those three limbs although AIBB may still raise challenges as to locus standi, overlap and double...
Court Disposition
Preliminary issues decided: excluded evidence relating to losses from Securities Commission rejection; held general damages encompass pecuniary and non-pecuniary losses in this case; allowed assessment to proceed on three limbs subject to challenges; procedural timetable set.
Orders
- Assessing Party is precluded from adducing any evidence relating to losses arising from the Securities Commission's rejection of the PCB Restructuring Scheme attributable to AIBB
- General damages awarded to Datuk Chang and RDA are to be treated as covering pecuniary and non-pecuniary losses and evidence to prove both categories may be adduced
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment