BATU KEMAS INDUSTRI SDN BHD 1. ) Kerajaan Malaysia 2. ) TENAGA NASIONAL BERHAD
Pre-judgment interest is discretionary and not awarded because Federal Court remit was specific; post-judgment interest at statutory rate 5% per annum is payable from the date of the High Court assessment judgment (17.3.2022) until full payment; the High Court did not err in awarding RM35,000,000 for replacement/repair where the valuation evidence was unrebutted and the judge made justified adjustments; documents marked "ID" are not admissible to prove quantum so heads supported only by ID documents reduced to nominal damages of RM1,000 each; deletion of para (b) as subsumed into para (f) and parties to bear their own costs.
- Citation
- A-01(W)-243-04/2022 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Parties
- Defendant/appellant: Kerajaan Malaysia; Plaintiff/appellant: Batu Kemas Industri Sdn Bhd; Defendant/appellant: Tenaga Nasional Berhad
- Court
- W
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 11 November 2024
- Case Number
- A-01(W)-243-04/2022 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Decision on Appeals From High Court Assessment of Damages Remitted by Federal Court
- Outcome
- Appeal 242 dismissed; Appeal 243 allowed in part (post-judgment interest awarded); Appeal 247 allowed in part (nominal damages for certain heads and deletion of subsumed award); parties to bear their own costs.
- Legal Topics
- Assessment of Damages, Pre Judgment Interest, Post Judgment Interest, Admissibility of Documents (id Documents), Scope of Remitted Issues, Nominal Damages, Burden of Proof
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kerajaan Malaysia
Defendant/appellant
Batu Kemas Industri Sdn Bhd
Plaintiff/appellant
Tenaga Nasional Berhad
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Decision on Appeals From High Court Assessment of Damages Remitted by Federal Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether pre-judgment interest should be awarded for the period from cause of action to judgment
- 2 Whether post-judgment interest runs from the assessment judgment date until payment
- 3 Whether documents marked as "ID" but not admitted as exhibits can support awards in assessment of damages
Ratio Decidendi
Pre-judgment interest is discretionary and not awarded because Federal Court remit was specific; post-judgment interest at statutory rate 5% per annum is payable from the date of the High Court assessment judgment (17.3.2022) until full payment; the High Court did not err in awarding RM35,000,000 for replacement/repair where the valuation evidence was unrebutted and the judge made justified adjustments; documents marked "ID" are not admissible to prove quantum so heads supported only by ID documents reduced to nominal damages of RM1,000 each; deletion of para (b) as subsumed into para (f) and parties to bear their own costs.
Court Disposition
Appeal 242 dismissed; Appeal 243 allowed in part (post-judgment interest awarded); Appeal 247 allowed in part (nominal damages for certain heads and deletion of subsumed award); parties to bear their own costs.
Orders
- Appeal 242 dismissed
- Appeal 243 allowed in part: interest at 5% per annum chargeable on the judgment debt from 17.3.2022 until full payment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment