PEMIUTANG PENGHAKIMAN ALLIANCE BANK MALAYSIA BERHAD PENGHUTANG PENGHAKIMAN 1. ) TAN ENG KIONG 2. ) Jabatan Insolvensi Malaysia
Court concluded KPI failed to demonstrate he considered the statutory factors in s33C(2) and instead relied on the debtor's proposed RM850 monthly payment; that failure amounted to improper exercise of discretion warranting judicial intervention. Court granted the applicant's request to suspend the automatic discharge for two years (14.10.2024 to 13.10.2026) and made no order as to costs.
- Citation
- JA-29PB-135-03/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Applicant / Judgment Creditor: Alliance Islamic Bank Berhad; Respondent 1 / Director General of Insolvency: Ketua Pengarah Insolvensi; Respondent 2 / Judgment Debtor: Tan Eng Kiong
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 14 October 2024
- Case Number
- JA-29PB-135-03/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Post Bankruptcy Application Under the Insolvency Act (s33 C) / Application to Suspend Automatic Discharge (interlocutory)
- Outcome
- Application by Alliance Islamic Bank to restrain/suspend the Director General from discharging the debtor under s33C allowed; discharge suspended for 2 years from 14.10.2024 to 13.10.2026; no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- Automatic Discharge Under S33 C, DGI Discretion in Determining Contribution, Suspension of Discharge, Requirements for Stated Reasons in Administrative Decisions
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alliance Islamic Bank Berhad
Applicant / Judgment Creditor
Ketua Pengarah Insolvensi
Respondent 1 / Director General of Insolvency
Tan Eng Kiong
Respondent 2 / Judgment Debtor
Procedural Posture
Post Bankruptcy Application Under the Insolvency Act (s33 C) / Application to Suspend Automatic Discharge (interlocutory)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Director General of Insolvency (KPI) properly considered the factors in s33C(2) when determining the contribution amount
- 2 Whether the Court should interfere with KPI's discretion to order suspension of automatic discharge
- 3 Whether the debtor's agreement to pay a proposed sum can substitute for the KPI's own assessment under s33C(2)
Ratio Decidendi
Court concluded KPI failed to demonstrate he considered the statutory factors in s33C(2) and instead relied on the debtor's proposed RM850 monthly payment; that failure amounted to improper exercise of discretion warranting judicial intervention. Court granted the applicant's request to suspend the automatic discharge for two years (14.10.2024 to 13.10.2026) and made no order as to costs.
Court Disposition
Application by Alliance Islamic Bank to restrain/suspend the Director General from discharging the debtor under s33C allowed; discharge suspended for 2 years from 14.10.2024 to 13.10.2026; no order as to costs.
Orders
- Suspend any automatic discharge under s33C of the Insolvency Act 1967 in respect of Tan Eng Kiong for a period of two years from 14.10.2024 to 13.10.2026 (pursuant to s33C(7)(b))
- No order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment