Bank Pertanian Malaysia Berhad 1. ) LF Marketing Sdn Bhd 2. ) Guan Lip Fatt @ Chin Lip Fatt 3. ) Cheong Tho Moi
Because the defendants failed to comply with court directions to file affidavit replies and written submissions, failed to attend the hearing (filing a last-minute adjournment letter which the court found not credible) and therefore admitted the plaintiff's affidavit evidence, the court allowed the plaintiff's applications: entered judgment for the plaintiff and struck out the defendants' counterclaim, awarding costs of RM1,500 for each application (total RM3,000).
- Citation
- NA-22M-124-08/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Bank Pertanian Malaysia Berhad; Defendan Pertama: LF Marketing Sdn Bhd; Defendan Kedua: Guan Lip Fatt @ Chin Lip Fatt; Defendan Ketiga: Cheong Tho Moi
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 29 January 2024
- Case Number
- NA-22M-124-08/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Banking (summary Judgment / Enforcement) / Judgment on Interlocutory/applications (appeal Against Orders Granting Plaintiff's Applications)
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's applications allowed; judgment entered against defendants and defendants' counterclaim struck out.
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Strike Out Counterclaim, Default Judgment, Failure to Comply With Case Management Directions, Affidavit Evidence, Guarantee and Security
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bank Pertanian Malaysia Berhad
Plaintiff
LF Marketing Sdn Bhd
Defendan Pertama
Guan Lip Fatt @ Chin Lip Fatt
Defendan Kedua
Cheong Tho Moi
Defendan Ketiga
Procedural Posture
Civil Banking (summary Judgment / Enforcement) / Judgment on Interlocutory/applications (appeal Against Orders Granting Plaintiff's Applications)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should grant plaintiff's application for judgment in default against the defendants
- 2 Whether the defendants' counterclaim should be struck out for non-compliance
- 3 Whether defendants' failure to attend hearing and to file affidavits justifies entry of judgment and costs
Ratio Decidendi
Because the defendants failed to comply with court directions to file affidavit replies and written submissions, failed to attend the hearing (filing a last-minute adjournment letter which the court found not credible) and therefore admitted the plaintiff's affidavit evidence, the court allowed the plaintiff's applications: entered judgment for the plaintiff and struck out the defendants' counterclaim, awarding costs of RM1,500 for each application (total RM3,000).
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's applications allowed; judgment entered against defendants and defendants' counterclaim struck out.
Orders
- Judgment entered for the Plaintiff for RM2,751,179.25 as at 8 August 2023
- Interest/compensation for late payment on RM2,751,179.25 to be calculated from 9 August 2023 until full settlement
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment