PEMIUTANG PENGHAKIMAN TIONG JOO TRADING SDN. BHD. PENGHUTANG PENGHAKIMAN WOO YOKE KENG

MA-29NCC-167-05/2024 Kand. 132 01/04/2026 11:37:51 DALAM МАНКАMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI MELAKА DALAM NEGERI MELAKA, MALAYSIA KEBANKRAPAN NO. MA-29NCC-167-05/2024 BERKENAAN DENGAN: WOO YOKE KENG (NO. K/P: 621006-01-5986) ...PENGHUTANG PENGHAKIMAN EX-PARTE : TIONG JOO TRADING SDN BHD (NO. SYARIKAT:...

Source-derived case information.

Citation: MA-29NCC-167-05/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Parties: Debtor: Woo Yoke Keng; Judgment Creditor: Tiong Joo Trading Sdn Bhd
Court: High Court
Jurisdiction: Malaysia
Judgment Date: 15 January 2026
Case Number: MA-29NCC-167-05/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Procedural Posture: Bankruptcy / Appeal Against Decision of Senior Assistant Registrar
Legal Topics: Bankruptcy Petition, Ex Parte Application, Appeal, Judgment Debt Enforcement

Bankruptcy Civil Procedure Bankruptcy Petition Ex Parte Application Appeal Judgment Debt Enforcement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Woo Yoke Keng

Debtor

Tiong Joo Trading Sdn Bhd

Judgment Creditor

Procedural Posture

Bankruptcy / Appeal Against Decision of Senior Assistant Registrar

Legal Issues

1 Whether a bankruptcy petition can be initiated ex parte based on a Court of Appeal judgment dated 27 July 2023
2 Whether the judgment debt relied upon is properly enforceable by bankruptcy proceedings
3 Whether procedural requirements for commencing and serving a bankruptcy petition were complied with

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.