PEMIUTANG PENGHAKIMAN TIONG JOO TRADING SDN. BHD. PENGHUTANG PENGHAKIMAN Lee Shaw Chin @ Lee Kim Leng

PEMIUTANG PENGHAKIMAN TIONG JOO TRADING SDN. BHD. PENGHUTANG PENGHAKIMAN Lee Shaw Chin @ Lee Kim Leng

The central question for decision was whether the Court of Appeal judgment of 27.07.2023 created a judgment debt sufficient to sustain the bankruptcy petition and whether the Senior Assistant Registrar committed reviewable error; the determination hinged on the legal characterisation of the judgment debt and the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
MA-29NCC-169-05/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Parties
Judgment Debtor: LEE SHAW CHIN @ LEE KIM LENG (No. K/P: 600107-04-5145); Judgment Creditor: TIONG JOO TRADING SDN BHD (Co. No. 197301001750 (14668-D))
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Malaysia
Judgment Date
15 January 2026
Case Number
MA-29NCC-169-05/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy (kebankrapan) / Appeal Against Senior Assistant Registrar Decision (enclosure 38) Grounds of Judgment
Outcome
Disposition not specified in excerpt
Legal Topics
Bankruptcy Petition, Judgment Debt, Appeal From Registrar Decision, Adjudication as Bankrupt
Bankruptcy Civil Procedure Enforcement of Judgment Bankruptcy Petition Judgment Debt Appeal From Registrar Decision Adjudication as Bankrupt

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

LEE SHAW CHIN @ LEE KIM LENG (No. K/P: 600107-04-5145)

Judgment Debtor

TIONG JOO TRADING SDN BHD (Co. No. 197301001750 (14668-D))

Judgment Creditor

Procedural Posture

Bankruptcy (kebankrapan) / Appeal Against Senior Assistant Registrar Decision (enclosure 38) Grounds of Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Court of Appeal judgment dated 27.07.2023 constitutes a proper foundation for a bankruptcy petition
  2. 2 Whether the Senior Assistant Registrar erred in law or fact in the decision recorded at Enclosure 38

Ratio Decidendi

The central question for decision was whether the Court of Appeal judgment of 27.07.2023 created a judgment debt sufficient to sustain the bankruptcy petition and whether the Senior Assistant Registrar committed reviewable error; the determination hinged on the legal characterisation of the judgment debt and the absence/presence of error in the registrar's decision.

Court Disposition

Disposition not specified in excerpt