1. ) NORMALASARI @ NORMAN SHAHFIZ BIN SALEHAN (WAKIL DIRI KEPADA ESTET DAN HARTA PUSAKA SALEHAN BIN SAPUAN) 2. ) RIBUT BINTI SAIDAN 3. ) MOHD ZAHIRUDDIN BIN SHAHIDAN 4. ) NORDIN BIN AHMAD 5. ) DOLMAT BIN SALIKEN 1. ) Azhar Bin Md Samoudin (
Plaintiffs failed to prove on the balance of probabilities that Salehan purchased the land and had a registrable beneficial interest; the constructive trust claim was not properly pleaded; the contractual cause (if existed) is time‑barred; plaintiffs (2–5) have no registrable interest or privity to defeat the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- JB-22NCvC-11-02/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff 1 (administrator/representative of Estate of Salehan Bin Sapuan): Normalasari @ Norman Shahfiz Bin Salehan; Plaintiff 2: Ribut Binti Saidan; Plaintiff 3: Mohd Zahiruddin Shahidan; Plaintiff 4: Nordin Bin Ahmad; Plaintiff 5: Dolmat Bin Saliken; Defendant 1 (representative/registered Transferee): Azhar Bin Md Samoudin; Defendant 2: Azhar Bin Md Samoudib
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 30 December 2024
- Case Number
- JB-22NCvC-11-02/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (land/title Dispute) / Judgment at High Court (trial)
- Outcome
- Plaintiffs' claims dismissed with costs. Defendants' counterclaims allowed with costs. Plaintiffs ordered to give vacant possession within six months; caveats lodged by Plaintiffs 1–3 ordered removed by the District Land Administrator and no new caveats to be accepted.
- Legal Topics
- Beneficial Ownership, Constructive Trust, Adverse Possession, Registrable Interest, Locus Standi, Declaratory Relief, Caveat, Limitation Period
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Normalasari @ Norman Shahfiz Bin Salehan
Plaintiff 1 (administrator/representative of Estate of Salehan Bin Sapuan)
Ribut Binti Saidan
Plaintiff 2
Mohd Zahiruddin Shahidan
Plaintiff 3
Nordin Bin Ahmad
Plaintiff 4
Dolmat Bin Saliken
Plaintiff 5
Azhar Bin Md Samoudin
Defendant 1 (representative/registered Transferee)
Azhar Bin Md Samoudib
Defendant 2
Procedural Posture
Civil (land/title Dispute) / Judgment at High Court (trial)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Salehan Binti Sapuan purchased the subject land from Md Samoudin and thereby acquired a beneficial/registrable interest
- 2 Whether plaintiffs have pleaded and proven a constructive trust
- 3 Whether plaintiffs have locus standi to pursue the claims as administrator/beneficiaries
Ratio Decidendi
Plaintiffs failed to prove on the balance of probabilities that Salehan purchased the land and had a registrable beneficial interest; the constructive trust claim was not properly pleaded; the contractual cause (if existed) is time‑barred; plaintiffs (2–5) have no registrable interest or privity to defeat the registered title; accordingly plaintiffs' claims were dismissed and defendants' counterclaims for vacant possession and removal of caveats were allowed with costs.
Court Disposition
Plaintiffs' claims dismissed with costs. Defendants' counterclaims allowed with costs. Plaintiffs ordered to give vacant possession within six months; caveats lodged by Plaintiffs 1–3 ordered removed by the District Land Administrator and no new caveats to be accepted.
Orders
- Plaintiffs' claims dismissed with costs
- Defendants' counterclaims for vacant possession allowed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment