1. Iconic Gateway Sdn Bhd 2. Dato Neoh Soo Keat 1. Forest Steel Sdn Bhd 2. Sam Siew Chong
Iconic unlawfully terminated the BSPC and LA because procurement of PMLs was Iconic's responsibility and absence of licences made performance impossible; Iconic was estopped by soliciting advance payment; the corporate veil could not be lifted because fraud was not pleaded or proved; conspiracy/inducement allegations lacked pleaded particulars and evidence; damages limited to proven wasted expenditure and subject to mitigation; appellate court varied specific awards and costs accordingly.
- Citation
- C-02(IM)(NCVC)-1348-07/2017 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Parties
- Appellant/plaintiff: Forest Steel Sdn Bhd; Appellant/defendant: Iconic Gateway Sdn Bhd; Appellant/director/shareholder: Dato Neoh Soo Keat; Respondent/managing Director: Sam Siew Chong
- Court
- IM
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 14 February 2020
- Case Number
- C-02(IM)(NCVC)-1348-07/2017 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment (decision Under Challenge Dated 14.6.2017); Court of Appeal Grounds of Judgment Dated 14.2.2020
- Outcome
- Appeal C-02(IM)(NCVC)-1348-07/2017 allowed in part; Appeal C-02(NCVC)-1349-07/2017 dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Contract, Termination, Specific Performance (withdrawn), Damages and Mitigation, Estoppel, Lifting the Corporate Veil, Turquand Indoor Management Rule, Mining Licences (pml), Particulars of Fraud, Elements of Conspiracy
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Forest Steel Sdn Bhd
Appellant/plaintiff
Iconic Gateway Sdn Bhd
Appellant/defendant
Dato Neoh Soo Keat
Appellant/director/shareholder
Sam Siew Chong
Respondent/managing Director
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment (decision Under Challenge Dated 14.6.2017); Court of Appeal Grounds of Judgment Dated 14.2.2020
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Iconic lawfully terminated the BSPC and Letter of Appointment
- 2 Who bore responsibility to procure PMLs required to commence mining
- 3 Whether Iconic was estopped from terminating after soliciting advance payment
Ratio Decidendi
Iconic unlawfully terminated the BSPC and LA because procurement of PMLs was Iconic's responsibility and absence of licences made performance impossible; Iconic was estopped by soliciting advance payment; the corporate veil could not be lifted because fraud was not pleaded or proved; conspiracy/inducement allegations lacked pleaded particulars and evidence; damages limited to proven wasted expenditure and subject to mitigation; appellate court varied specific awards and costs accordingly.
Court Disposition
Appeal C-02(IM)(NCVC)-1348-07/2017 allowed in part; Appeal C-02(NCVC)-1349-07/2017 dismissed
Orders
- Set aside High Court order holding Dato Neoh personally liable; Dato Neoh relieved of personal liability in respect of Forest Steel’s claim
- Vary High Court award for wages: substitute RM166,594.55 in place of RM350,094.55
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment