EMERCON BINA SDN BHD KUMPULAN PRASARANA RAKYAT JOHOR SDN BHD
The Court held that oral collateral assurances together with pleaded implied terms and admissions imposed on the defendant a contractual obligation to apply for and procure surrender and re-alienation; the defendant failed to take reasonable positive steps (including appealing to the Menteri Besar or negotiating with Johor Corp), the subsequent transfer of the Project Land was a self‑induced act and did not amount to frustration, the Deed of Settlement constituted acknowledgement of liability and preserved the claim, and the plaintiff proved loss of profits of RM50,215,120.00 which should be awarded in full (trial judge erred in unilaterally halving that sum).
- Citation
- J-02(NCVC)(W)-330-02/2018 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Parties
- Plaintiff/appellant (in Appeal No.330): Emercon Bina Sdn Bhd; Defendant/appellant (in Appeal No.329): Kumpulan Prasarana Rakyat Johor Sdn Bhd
- Court
- NCVC
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 12 September 2019
- Case Number
- J-02(NCVC)(W)-330-02/2018 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (contract Dispute) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Consolidated Appeals From High Court After Trial
- Outcome
- Appeal No. J-02(NCVC)(W)-329-02/2018 dismissed (High Court decision affirmed); Appeal No. J-02(NCVC)(W)-330-02/2018 allowed (trial judge's reduction set aside)
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Development Agreement, Joint Venture and Collateral Assurances, Surrender and Re Alienation of Land, Frustration of Contract, Adverse Inference Under Evidence Act S114(g), Deed of Settlement and Estoppel, Quantum of Loss of Profits
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Emercon Bina Sdn Bhd
Plaintiff/appellant (in Appeal No.330)
Kumpulan Prasarana Rakyat Johor Sdn Bhd
Defendant/appellant (in Appeal No.329)
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (contract Dispute) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Consolidated Appeals From High Court After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether oral collateral assurances by defendant's CEO were binding and constituted a collateral agreement
- 2 Whether defendant had contractual duty to procure surrender and re-alienation and whether it breached that duty by failing to take reasonable positive steps (including appealing to the Menteri Besar or meeting Johor Corp)
- 3 Whether transfer of Project Land to Johor Corp or rejection of application constituted frustration or a supervening event excusing performance
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that oral collateral assurances together with pleaded implied terms and admissions imposed on the defendant a contractual obligation to apply for and procure surrender and re-alienation; the defendant failed to take reasonable positive steps (including appealing to the Menteri Besar or negotiating with Johor Corp), the subsequent transfer of the Project Land was a self‑induced act and did not amount to frustration, the Deed of Settlement constituted acknowledgement of liability and preserved the claim, and the plaintiff proved loss of profits of RM50,215,120.00 which should be awarded in full (trial judge erred in unilaterally halving that sum).
Court Disposition
Appeal No. J-02(NCVC)(W)-329-02/2018 dismissed (High Court decision affirmed); Appeal No. J-02(NCVC)(W)-330-02/2018 allowed (trial judge's reduction set aside)
Orders
- Set aside trial judge's deduction of damages by one-half
- Award plaintiff damages for loss of profits in the full sum of RM50,215,120.00
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment