NYO NYO AYE 1) KEVIN SATHIASEELAN A/L RAMAKRISHNAN 2) MESSRS SYED ALWI NG & CO
The Court held the cause of action accrued when actual damage occurred — namely when the underlying suit was struck off by the High Court on 24.8.2009 — therefore the plaintiff's claim filed 29.4.2015 was within the six‑year limitation period; the Court affirmed the High Court finding that the defendants breached the retainer and were negligent in failing to advise, seek extension or otherwise protect the client's position and remitted the matter for assessment of damages.
- Citation
- W-02(NCVC)(W)-12-01/2018 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Parties
- Appellant/plaintiff: Nyo Nyo Aye; Respondent/defendant: Kevin Sathiaseelan A/L Ramakrishnan; Respondent/defendant: Messrs Syed Alwi Ng & Co
- Court
- NCVC
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 24 July 2018
- Case Number
- W-02(NCVC)(W)-12-01/2018 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (professional Negligence and Breach of Retainer Arising From Striking Off of Underlying Suit) / Court of Appeal Judgment Allowing Plaintiff Appeal on Limitation, Affirming Negligence Findings, Remitted to High Court for Assessment of Damages
- Outcome
- Plaintiff appeal allowed on limitation; High Court order on limitation set aside; Defendants' appeal dismissed on negligence; High Court finding of breach of retainer and negligence affirmed; matter remitted for assessment of damages.
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Retainer, Limitation Period, Security for Costs, Striking Off for Non Compliance, Loss of Chance, Assessment of Damages
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nyo Nyo Aye
Appellant/plaintiff
Kevin Sathiaseelan A/L Ramakrishnan
Respondent/defendant
Messrs Syed Alwi Ng & Co
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (professional Negligence and Breach of Retainer Arising From Striking Off of Underlying Suit) / Court of Appeal Judgment Allowing Plaintiff Appeal on Limitation, Affirming Negligence Findings, Remitted to High Court for Assessment of Damages
Legal Issues
- 1 When did the cause of action accrue for negligence/breach of retainer (date of non‑compliance with SFC or date suit was struck off)?
- 2 Whether solicitors breached their retainer duty and were negligent in failing to advise, seek extension or otherwise prevent striking off
- 3 Whether the plaintiff had an appreciable prospect of success in the underlying probate action
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held the cause of action accrued when actual damage occurred — namely when the underlying suit was struck off by the High Court on 24.8.2009 — therefore the plaintiff's claim filed 29.4.2015 was within the six‑year limitation period; the Court affirmed the High Court finding that the defendants breached the retainer and were negligent in failing to advise, seek extension or otherwise protect the client's position and remitted the matter for assessment of damages.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff appeal allowed on limitation; High Court order on limitation set aside; Defendants' appeal dismissed on negligence; High Court finding of breach of retainer and negligence affirmed; matter remitted for assessment of damages.
Orders
- Set aside High Court decision on limitation dated 29.11.2017
- Affirmed High Court finding that defendants were negligent and in breach of retainer dated 29.11.2017
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment