MUHAMMAD ADEY RAIMEY BIN ROZALI

MUHAMMAD ADEY RAIMEY BIN ROZALI

Breach of the mandatory supervision condition (failure to attend AADK rehabilitation programmes) was proven, AADK made reasonable efforts to secure compliance, accused's mitigation did not outweigh the seriousness and public interest in deterrence; therefore a custodial sentence of seven months commencing from date of arrest was appropriate and within statutory limits.

Citation
PB-83D-2607-07/2025 (Mahkamah Majistret)
Parties
Prosecutor: PENDAKWA RAYA; Accused: MUHAMMAD ADEY RAIMEY BIN ROZALI
Court
Magistrates' Court
Jurisdiction
Malaysia
Judgment Date
8 July 2025
Case Number
PB-83D-2607-07/2025 (Mahkamah Majistret)
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
Guilty plea accepted; sentence of 7 months' imprisonment imposed commencing from date of arrest (23 June 2025).
Legal Topics
Breach of Supervision Order, Rehabilitation and Treatment Orders, Mitigation and Aggravation, Sentencing Principles, Public Interest and Deterrence
Source Language
Malay/English
Criminal Law Drug Offences Sentencing Breach of Supervision Order Rehabilitation and Treatment Orders Mitigation and Aggravation Sentencing Principles Public Interest and Deterrence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 22 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

PENDAKWA RAYA

Prosecutor

MUHAMMAD ADEY RAIMEY BIN ROZALI

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether accused breached conditions of a supervision order under Section 6(2)(f) of the Drug Dependants (Treatment & Rehabilitation) Act 1983
  2. 2 Appropriate form and length of sentence under Section 6(3) of the Act
  3. 3 Extent to which guilty plea and personal mitigation should reduce sentence

Ratio Decidendi

Breach of the mandatory supervision condition (failure to attend AADK rehabilitation programmes) was proven, AADK made reasonable efforts to secure compliance, accused's mitigation did not outweigh the seriousness and public interest in deterrence; therefore a custodial sentence of seven months commencing from date of arrest was appropriate and within statutory limits.

Court Disposition

Guilty plea accepted; sentence of 7 months' imprisonment imposed commencing from date of arrest (23 June 2025).

Orders

  • Accused sentenced to 7 months imprisonment commencing 23 June 2025