CHEW ENG CHOON & 2 ORS PROFOUND GATEWAY SDN BHD & 4 ORS
Defendants failed to show that ex-parte communications affected the valuation, failed to prove material departure from the engagement or lack of independence, and waived opportunities to challenge the report; accordingly the court accepted the KPMG Valuation Report as the fair value and awarded consequential buy-out orders including interest from the date of filing.
- Citation
- WA-24NCC-200-05/2014 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: CHEW ENG CHOON; Plaintiff: PUAH KEH MING; Plaintiff: TAN CHOON TIAN; Defendant: PROFOUND GATEWAY SDN BHD; Defendant: CHEW BROTHERS PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SDN BHD; Defendant: CHEW LEP TICK; Defendant: TAN AIK BENG; Defendant: CHIN SIEW WEI
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 28 May 2021
- Case Number
- WA-24NCC-200-05/2014 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Oppression Petition Under Section 181 Companies Act 1965 (buy Out) / Consequential Orders Following Cross Examination of Court Appointed Valuer and Dismissal of Applications to Challenge Valuation Report
- Outcome
- Defendants' applications (enclosures 237 and 238) dismissed; KPMG Valuation Report accepted as fair value; consequential buy-out orders made and interest awarded
- Legal Topics
- Oppression, Buy Out Order, Court Appointed Expert, Cross Examination of Expert, Ex Parte Communications, Scope of Expert's Engagement, Interest on Buy Out Price, Compliance With Terms of Engagement
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CHEW ENG CHOON
Plaintiff
PUAH KEH MING
Plaintiff
TAN CHOON TIAN
Plaintiff
PROFOUND GATEWAY SDN BHD
Defendant
CHEW BROTHERS PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SDN BHD
Defendant
CHEW LEP TICK
Defendant
TAN AIK BENG
Defendant
CHIN SIEW WEI
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Oppression Petition Under Section 181 Companies Act 1965 (buy Out) / Consequential Orders Following Cross Examination of Court Appointed Valuer and Dismissal of Applications to Challenge Valuation Report
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether ex-parte communications between parties and the court-appointed expert vitiated the valuation report
- 2 Whether the court-appointed expert materially departed from the scope of engagement
- 3 Whether the expert lacked independence or was biased
Ratio Decidendi
Defendants failed to show that ex-parte communications affected the valuation, failed to prove material departure from the engagement or lack of independence, and waived opportunities to challenge the report; accordingly the court accepted the KPMG Valuation Report as the fair value and awarded consequential buy-out orders including interest from the date of filing.
Court Disposition
Defendants' applications (enclosures 237 and 238) dismissed; KPMG Valuation Report accepted as fair value; consequential buy-out orders made and interest awarded
Orders
- Enclosure 237 dismissed with costs of RM10,000 payable by the 1st Defendant to the Plaintiffs (order dated 4.3.2021)
- Enclosure 238 dismissed with costs of RM10,000 payable by the 2nd to 5th Defendants to the Plaintiffs (order dated 4.3.2021)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment