CIP GROUP SDN BHD 1. ) RENQUI DONGTAI IMPORT & EXPORT TRADE CO LTD 2. ) SITC CONTAINERS LINES MALAYSIA SDN BHD 3. ) KMTC LINE (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD 4. ) HEUNG-A (M) SDN BHD
The court exercised its discretion under Order 15 (r6/r8) and held that KMTCL and HALCL demonstrated a sufficient legal interest (as carriers/through agency relationships) and that their rights would be directly affected by the injunction and plaintiff's possession of the cargo; permitting intervention prevents multiplicity of proceedings and ensures complete adjudication, therefore leave to intervene was granted with costs in the cause.
- Citation
- BA-22NCvC-98-03/2025 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: CIP GROUP SDN. BHD.; 1st Defendant: RENQUI DONGTAI IMPORT & EXPORT TRADE CO. LTD.; 2nd Defendant: SITC CONTAINERS LINES MALAYSIA SDN. BHD.; 3rd Defendant: KMTC LINE (MALAYSIA) SDN. BHD.; 4th Defendant: HEUNGA-A (M) SDN. BHD.; Intervener: KOREA MARINE TRANSPORT CO. LTD.; Intervener: HEUNG A LINE CO. LTD
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 28 July 2025
- Case Number
- BA-22NCvC-98-03/2025 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Intervention Application in a Civil Suit Concerning Cargo, Bills of Lading and Injunctions / Interlocutory – Application to Intervene Decided (leave Granted)
- Outcome
- Applications Enclosures 27 and 40 allowed; proposed interveners granted leave to intervene; costs in the cause.
- Legal Topics
- Intervention, Order 15 Rule 6, Bills of Lading, Carrier's Rights and Liabilities, Agency and Principal/agent Liability, Original Bill of Lading Requirement, Misjoinder/non‑joinder, Injunctions
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CIP GROUP SDN. BHD.
Plaintiff
RENQUI DONGTAI IMPORT & EXPORT TRADE CO. LTD.
1st Defendant
SITC CONTAINERS LINES MALAYSIA SDN. BHD.
2nd Defendant
KMTC LINE (MALAYSIA) SDN. BHD.
3rd Defendant
HEUNGA-A (M) SDN. BHD.
4th Defendant
KOREA MARINE TRANSPORT CO. LTD.
Intervener
HEUNG A LINE CO. LTD
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Civil Intervention Application in a Civil Suit Concerning Cargo, Bills of Lading and Injunctions / Interlocutory – Application to Intervene Decided (leave Granted)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether proposed interveners have a sufficient legal interest to intervene
- 2 Whether agents/carriers' rights are directly affected by the injunction and plaintiff's possession of cargo
- 3 Whether intervention should be allowed to prevent multiplicity of proceedings and ensure complete adjudication
Ratio Decidendi
The court exercised its discretion under Order 15 (r6/r8) and held that KMTCL and HALCL demonstrated a sufficient legal interest (as carriers/through agency relationships) and that their rights would be directly affected by the injunction and plaintiff's possession of the cargo; permitting intervention prevents multiplicity of proceedings and ensures complete adjudication, therefore leave to intervene was granted with costs in the cause.
Court Disposition
Applications Enclosures 27 and 40 allowed; proposed interveners granted leave to intervene; costs in the cause.
Orders
- Leave granted to Korea Marine Transport Co. Ltd to intervene in Civil Suit No BA-22NCvC-98-03/2025
- Leave granted to Heung A Line Co. Ltd to intervene in Civil Suit No BA-22NCvC-98-03/2025
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment