1. ) Lee Yee Wuen 2. ) Ladang Sri Harapan (Sabah) Sdn Bhd Perfect Oil Resources (Sabah) Sdn Bhd
On the facts the Court of Appeal found the respondents provided credible, non-frivolous reasons (COVID-19 SOP compliance and security of private plantation) for imposing conditions and denying access; their conduct did not establish wilful or deliberate disobedience beyond reasonable doubt, so the High Court contempt finding and associated fine were set aside and costs awarded to respondents.
- Citation
- S-02(IM)(NCvC)-1920-10/2022 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Parties
- 1st Appellant (also 1st Respondent in Related Appeal): Lee Yee Wuen; 2nd Appellant (also 2nd Respondent in Related Appeal): Ladang Sri Harapan (Sabah) Sdn Bhd; Respondent (also Appellant in Related Appeal): Perfect Oil Resources (Sabah) Sdn Bhd
- Court
- IM
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 22 January 2025
- Case Number
- S-02(IM)(NCvC)-1920-10/2022 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Determination by Court of Appeal (final Judgment on Related Appeals)
- Outcome
- Appeal S-02(IM)(NCvC)-1920-10/2022 allowed: High Court contempt finding set aside and respondents' appeal allowed with costs. Appeal S-02(IM)(NCvC)-1936-10/2022 dismissed (no order as to costs).
- Legal Topics
- Committal for Contempt, Interim Injunction, Stay of Execution, Director Liability for Corporate Contempt, Standard Operating Procedures (covid 19)
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lee Yee Wuen
1st Appellant (also 1st Respondent in Related Appeal)
Ladang Sri Harapan (Sabah) Sdn Bhd
2nd Appellant (also 2nd Respondent in Related Appeal)
Perfect Oil Resources (Sabah) Sdn Bhd
Respondent (also Appellant in Related Appeal)
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Determination by Court of Appeal (final Judgment on Related Appeals)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondents wilfully and deliberately disobeyed the interim injunction dated 4 September 2020
- 2 Whether a company and/or its managing director can be held liable for contempt
- 3 Whether the respondents' reliance on COVID-19 SOPs and demands for vehicle/driver identification absolved or mitigated contempt
Ratio Decidendi
On the facts the Court of Appeal found the respondents provided credible, non-frivolous reasons (COVID-19 SOP compliance and security of private plantation) for imposing conditions and denying access; their conduct did not establish wilful or deliberate disobedience beyond reasonable doubt, so the High Court contempt finding and associated fine were set aside and costs awarded to respondents.
Court Disposition
Appeal S-02(IM)(NCvC)-1920-10/2022 allowed: High Court contempt finding set aside and respondents' appeal allowed with costs. Appeal S-02(IM)(NCvC)-1936-10/2022 dismissed (no order as to costs).
Orders
- Set aside High Court order finding respondents in contempt dated 21 September 2022
- Awarded costs to respondents in the appeal: RM20,000
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment