Tan Hock Kien (GRN 56990) Pentadbir Tanah Kuala Langat
Applicants failed to discharge the burden to show the award was inadequate. The court accepted assessors' views and evidence supporting the respondent's valuation (RM290/sqm) and maintained the respondent's award. Claims for severance, injurious affection and ancillary losses (loss of oil palms, legal costs) were rejected as unsupported or double counting; Jed Tradisi's planning fee award was maintained. Applicants ordered to pay RM500 each to the government and private assessors.
- Citation
- BA-15-99-06/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Applicant (registered Owner, 1/3): Tan Hock Kien; Applicant (registered Owner, 1/3): Tan Teng Hock; Applicant (registered Owner, 1/3): Wong Kuan; Applicant (purchaser With Beneficial Interest): Jed Tradisi Sdn Bhd; Respondent (land Administrator): Pentadbir Tanah Daerah Kuala Langat
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 15 June 2023
- Case Number
- BA-15-99-06/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Land Acquisition Reference Under Section 38(5) of the Land Acquisition Act 1960 / Reference Hearing Before High Court With Assessors; Judgment and Determination of Objections
- Outcome
- Respondent's awards upheld; applicants' objections dismissed in all material respects except maintenance of planning fee award to Jed Tradisi
- Legal Topics
- Compensation, Market Valuation, Severance (pecah Pisah), Injurious Affection, Procedural Burden of Proof, Assessors' Role
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tan Hock Kien
Applicant (registered Owner, 1/3)
Tan Teng Hock
Applicant (registered Owner, 1/3)
Wong Kuan
Applicant (registered Owner, 1/3)
Jed Tradisi Sdn Bhd
Applicant (purchaser With Beneficial Interest)
Pentadbir Tanah Daerah Kuala Langat
Respondent (land Administrator)
Procedural Posture
Land Acquisition Reference Under Section 38(5) of the Land Acquisition Act 1960 / Reference Hearing Before High Court With Assessors; Judgment and Determination of Objections
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the award by the Land Administrator was inadequate
- 2 Proper market value to be applied per square metre
- 3 Whether severance (pecah pisah) damages arise
Ratio Decidendi
Applicants failed to discharge the burden to show the award was inadequate. The court accepted assessors' views and evidence supporting the respondent's valuation (RM290/sqm) and maintained the respondent's award. Claims for severance, injurious affection and ancillary losses (loss of oil palms, legal costs) were rejected as unsupported or double counting; Jed Tradisi's planning fee award was maintained. Applicants ordered to pay RM500 each to the government and private assessors.
Court Disposition
Respondent's awards upheld; applicants' objections dismissed in all material respects except maintenance of planning fee award to Jed Tradisi
Orders
- Maintain award of RM412090.00 to each registered owner (Tan Hock Kien, Tan Teng Hock, Wong Kuan)
- Maintain award of RM73670.00 to Jed Tradisi Sdn Bhd (planning fee)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment