NORTHERN GREEN VENTURES SDN BHD PENTADBIR TANAH HULU LANGAT
No breach of natural justice: statute imposes no duty to disclose JPPH report at land enquiry; Section 12 and Third Schedule govern procedure. Paragraph 4(a) of the First Schedule precludes a claimant from obtaining an award for market value in excess of the valuation/amount it submitted at the land enquiry; therefore appellant could not pursue the higher JPPH valuation at Land Reference. Assessors were entitled to give written factual opinions under ss.40A/40C and the judge properly exercised independent judgment. Plot A is landlocked on the evidence and warrants additional compensation; Court awards RM600,000 for construction of a connecting road and 5% late payment charges from date of...
- Citation
- B-01(A)-553-10/2020 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Parties
- Appellant / Perayu / Registered Proprietor: Northern Green Ventures Sdn Bhd; Respondent / Land Administrator: Pentadbir Tanah, Hulu Langat
- Court
- A
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 19 August 2022
- Case Number
- B-01(A)-553-10/2020 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Procedural Posture
- Land Acquisition Act Reference Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Questions of Law Arising From High Court Land Reference
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; Court affirmed High Court's conclusions except ordered additional compensation for access and late payment interest; otherwise High Court and Land Administrator awards maintained; no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- Compulsory Acquisition, Injurious Affection, Severance, Natural Justice and Disclosure, Assessment of Market Value, Role of Assessors, Limitation on Awards (paragraph 4(a) First Schedule), Planning Permission and Development Potential, Legal Access/landlocked, Late Payment Interest
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Northern Green Ventures Sdn Bhd
Appellant / Perayu / Registered Proprietor
Pentadbir Tanah, Hulu Langat
Respondent / Land Administrator
Procedural Posture
Land Acquisition Act Reference Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Questions of Law Arising From High Court Land Reference
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether non‑disclosure of government valuer (JPPH) report at land enquiry breached natural justice
- 2 Whether appellant bound by its own valuation submitted at land enquiry and barred from claiming higher market value at Land Reference (Paragraph 4(a))
- 3 Whether endorsement of government valuer by appellant establishes prima facie case of inadequacy
Ratio Decidendi
No breach of natural justice: statute imposes no duty to disclose JPPH report at land enquiry; Section 12 and Third Schedule govern procedure. Paragraph 4(a) of the First Schedule precludes a claimant from obtaining an award for market value in excess of the valuation/amount it submitted at the land enquiry; therefore appellant could not pursue the higher JPPH valuation at Land Reference. Assessors were entitled to give written factual opinions under ss.40A/40C and the judge properly exercised independent judgment. Plot A is landlocked on the evidence and warrants additional compensation; Court awards RM600,000 for construction of a connecting road and 5% late payment charges from date of...
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; Court affirmed High Court's conclusions except ordered additional compensation for access and late payment interest; otherwise High Court and Land Administrator awards maintained; no order as to costs.
Orders
- Respondent to pay appellant additional compensation of RM600000.00 for construction of road access between severed plots
- Respondent to pay appellant 5% late payment charges from date of Borang K
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment