Tee Kim Hock Pentadbir Tanah dan Daerah PIHAK TERKILAN West Coast Expressway Sdn Bhd
Section 38(5) is not mandatory because s.38(6) expressly permits the Court to extend the period; failure by the Land Administrator to file Form O within six months does not oust jurisdiction and the Court may grant an extension to regularize the proceedings; accordingly the extension to 30.7.2018 is allowed and the strike out application dismissed.
- Citation
- BA-15-231-07/2018 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- PEMOHON: TEE KIM HOCK; RESPONDEN: PENTADBIR TANAH DAERAH KLANG; PIHAK BERKEPENTINGAN: WEST COAST EXPRESSWAY SDN BHD
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 13 November 2024
- Case Number
- BA-15-231-07/2018 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Land Reference (civil) / Interlocutory Applications Decided (strike Out and Extension of Time)
- Outcome
- Application of WCE (Enclosure 51) dismissed; Applicant's application (Enclosure 53) to extend time allowed; costs in the cause.
- Legal Topics
- Compulsory Acquisition, Compensation, Statutory Time Limits, Extension of Time, Jurisdiction
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
TEE KIM HOCK
PEMOHON
PENTADBIR TANAH DAERAH KLANG
RESPONDEN
WEST COAST EXPRESSWAY SDN BHD
PIHAK BERKEPENTINGAN
Procedural Posture
Land Reference (civil) / Interlocutory Applications Decided (strike Out and Extension of Time)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether s.38(5) of the Land Acquisition Act 1960 is mandatory or directory
- 2 Whether late filing of Form O ousts the Court's jurisdiction to hear the land reference
- 3 Whether s.38(6) can be invoked where Form O has already been filed out of time
Ratio Decidendi
Section 38(5) is not mandatory because s.38(6) expressly permits the Court to extend the period; failure by the Land Administrator to file Form O within six months does not oust jurisdiction and the Court may grant an extension to regularize the proceedings; accordingly the extension to 30.7.2018 is allowed and the strike out application dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application of WCE (Enclosure 51) dismissed; Applicant's application (Enclosure 53) to extend time allowed; costs in the cause.
Orders
- Dismissed: Enclosure 51 (WCE strike out application)
- Allowed: Enclosure 53 (extension of time to file Form O to 30.7.2018)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment