LIM KOK WING UNIVERSITY OF CREATIVE TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL SENDIRIAN BERHAD (NO. SYARIKAT : 866451-K) ASHLEY ALEXANDER MUSGRAVE (NO. PASSPORT : 548379842)
The High Court held that the consent Award Persetujuan entered on 07.09.2020 must be respected and cannot be set aside on the sole ground of internal company management or alleged lack of mandate where the opposing party dealt with the company in good faith and there are no allegations of fraud, mistake or misrepresentation; accordingly the defendant's application (Lampiran 24) to strike out the writ and statement of claim was allowed.
- Citation
- WA-22NCVC-651-10/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintif: LIM KOK WING UNIVERSITY OF CREATIVE TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL SENDIRIAN BERHAD (866451-K); Defendan: ASHLEY ALEXANDER MUSGRAVE (Passport No. 548379842)
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 8 November 2021
- Case Number
- WA-22NCVC-651-10/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (guaman Sivil) / Interlocutory Application Under Rule 18 Kaedah 19(1) to Strike Out Writ and Statement of Claim and to Uphold/set Aside Consent Award (lampiran 24)
- Outcome
- Lampiran 24 allowed; writ and statement of claim struck out; consent Award Persetujuan upheld.
- Legal Topics
- Consent Judgment, Setting Aside Consent Award, Turquand Rule (indoor Management), Mandate of Company Representative, Abuse of Process, Constructive Dismissal
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
LIM KOK WING UNIVERSITY OF CREATIVE TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL SENDIRIAN BERHAD (866451-K)
Plaintif
ASHLEY ALEXANDER MUSGRAVE (Passport No. 548379842)
Defendan
Procedural Posture
Civil (guaman Sivil) / Interlocutory Application Under Rule 18 Kaedah 19(1) to Strike Out Writ and Statement of Claim and to Uphold/set Aside Consent Award (lampiran 24)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the consent Award Persetujuan entered 07.09.2020 can be set aside
- 2 Whether the company representative (Dato Wong) had mandat/authority to enter the consent award
- 3 Whether the plaintiff's writ and statement of claim are scandalous, frivolous or an abuse of process
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court held that the consent Award Persetujuan entered on 07.09.2020 must be respected and cannot be set aside on the sole ground of internal company management or alleged lack of mandate where the opposing party dealt with the company in good faith and there are no allegations of fraud, mistake or misrepresentation; accordingly the defendant's application (Lampiran 24) to strike out the writ and statement of claim was allowed.
Court Disposition
Lampiran 24 allowed; writ and statement of claim struck out; consent Award Persetujuan upheld.
Orders
- Lampiran 24 allowed
- Writ Saman and Pernyataan Tuntutan Plaintif struck out
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment