INTEGRATED TRAINING AND SERVICES SDN BHD (NO SYARIKAT. 601001-V) 1. KERAJAAN MALAYSIA 2. AGENSI PENGUATKUASAAN MARITIM MALAYSIA (APMM) 3. KETUA PENGARAH BAHAGIAN HAL EHWAL PENGUATKUASAAN MARITIM MALAYSIA
The Court of Appeal held that the Deputy Registrar acted on a wrong principle of law by accepting the auditor's report in the assessment without ensuring the auditor gave sworn evidence and was available for cross-examination after defendants raised meritorious objections; therefore the High Court's order setting aside the Deputy Registrar's assessment and directing appointment of a new auditor for reassessment before the Deputy Registrar was correct and is affirmed
- Citation
- W-01(IM)(NCVC)-235-07/2017 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Parties
- Appellant / Plaintiff: Integrated Training And Services Sdn Bhd; Respondent / Defendant: Kerajaan Malaysia; Respondent / Defendant: Agensi Penguatkuasaan Maritim Malaysia (APMM); Respondent / Defendant: Ketua Pengarah Bahagian Hal Ehwal Penguatkuasaan Maritim Malaysia
- Court
- IM
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 13 March 2018
- Case Number
- W-01(IM)(NCVC)-235-07/2017 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal Heard by Court of Appeal; Decision on Interlocutory Assessment and Remittal to High Court for Reassessment by Auditor
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; High Court order dated 16 June 2017 affirmed; matter remitted to High Court for damages reassessment by a newly appointed independent auditor
- Legal Topics
- Contract Termination, Damages Assessment, Admissibility of Auditor Report, Right to Cross Examine Expert, Res Judicata
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Integrated Training And Services Sdn Bhd
Appellant / Plaintiff
Kerajaan Malaysia
Respondent / Defendant
Agensi Penguatkuasaan Maritim Malaysia (APMM)
Respondent / Defendant
Ketua Pengarah Bahagian Hal Ehwal Penguatkuasaan Maritim Malaysia
Respondent / Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Heard by Court of Appeal; Decision on Interlocutory Assessment and Remittal to High Court for Reassessment by Auditor
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Deputy Registrar erred in accepting an auditor's report without calling the auditor to give sworn evidence when objections were raised
- 2 Whether the auditor's report complied with clause 27.4 of the contract and the Court of Appeal's order
- 3 Whether the objections by defendants raised a legitimate challenge requiring a hearing
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal held that the Deputy Registrar acted on a wrong principle of law by accepting the auditor's report in the assessment without ensuring the auditor gave sworn evidence and was available for cross-examination after defendants raised meritorious objections; therefore the High Court's order setting aside the Deputy Registrar's assessment and directing appointment of a new auditor for reassessment before the Deputy Registrar was correct and is affirmed
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; High Court order dated 16 June 2017 affirmed; matter remitted to High Court for damages reassessment by a newly appointed independent auditor
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Affirmed High Court order dated 16 June 2017 (setting aside Deputy Registrar's assessment)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment