Conweld Engineering Sdn Bhd 1. ) Low Terk Chen 2. ) Low Man Fook 3. ) NG WAM WOOI PIHAK KETIGA 1. ) Goh Swee Boh @ Goh Cheng Kin 2. ) Goh Tze Chien PIHAK TERKILAN GOH TZE CHIEN
The court exercised its discretion to set aside the striking out order and reinstate the suit because the plaintiff provided an honest and genuine explanation for the delay, demonstrated sincere efforts to obtain and retain representation and committed to comply with future directions; the derivative nature of the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- WA-22NCC-108-03/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: CONWELD ENGINEERING SDN BHD; Defendant: LOW TERK CHEN; Defendant: LOW MAN FOOK; Defendant: NG WAN WOOI; Third Party: GOH SWEE BOH @ GOH CHENG KIN; Third Party: GOH TZE CHIEN
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 24 July 2024
- Case Number
- WA-22NCC-108-03/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit (commercial Division) Derivative Action / Reinstatement Application Following Striking Out for Non Compliance With Pre Trial Case Management Directions; Matter to Be Fixed for Case Management
- Outcome
- Striking Out Orders dated 5.2.2024 set aside; suit reinstated; matter to be fixed for case management forthwith
- Legal Topics
- Striking Out, Reinstatement, Pre Trial Case Management, Leave to Commence Derivative Action, Costs
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CONWELD ENGINEERING SDN BHD
Plaintiff
LOW TERK CHEN
Defendant
LOW MAN FOOK
Defendant
NG WAN WOOI
Defendant
GOH SWEE BOH @ GOH CHENG KIN
Third Party
GOH TZE CHIEN
Third Party
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit (commercial Division) Derivative Action / Reinstatement Application Following Striking Out for Non Compliance With Pre Trial Case Management Directions; Matter to Be Fixed for Case Management
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to set aside striking out order for non-compliance with pre-trial case management directions and reinstate the suit
- 2 Whether the plaintiff's reasons for delay justify exercise of the court's discretion to reinstate
- 3 Whether delay should be addressed by costs rather than continuing the striking out
Ratio Decidendi
The court exercised its discretion to set aside the striking out order and reinstate the suit because the plaintiff provided an honest and genuine explanation for the delay, demonstrated sincere efforts to obtain and retain representation and committed to comply with future directions; the derivative nature of the action and previously granted and affirmed leave weighed in favour of allowing the plaintiff its day in court, with delay to be remedied by costs if appropriate.
Court Disposition
Striking Out Orders dated 5.2.2024 set aside; suit reinstated; matter to be fixed for case management forthwith
Orders
- Striking Out Orders dated 5.2.2024 set aside
- Plaintiff's suit reinstated
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment