PEMILIK KAPAL ATAU VESSEL "PDZ MEAH" (NO. IMO 9064009) DARI PELABUHAN KLANG (PDZ HOLDINGS BERHAD) DAN BUNKERING (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD
Because the plaintiff issued the writ in rem and obtained a statutory lien before the defendant company was wound up, the plaintiff ranked as a secured creditor entitled to realise the vessel and have the sale proceeds applied to its claim; the consent order was validly entered with representation and did not extinguish the plaintiff's lien; accordingly plaintiff's O.70 r.21 application for determination of priorities and payment out succeeded and defendants' applications to set aside the consent order or for return of proceeds were dismissed.
- Citation
- WA-27NCC-8-01/2017 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Dan-Bunkering (Singapore) Pte Ltd; 1st Defendant: The Owners of the Ship or Vessel "PDZ MEWAH"; Perkapalan Dai Zhun Sdn Bhd (In Liquidation); 2nd Defendant: Perkapalan Dai Zhun Sdn Bhd (In Liquidation)
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 26 April 2021
- Case Number
- WA-27NCC-8-01/2017 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Admiralty in Rem Action / Post Trial Applications for Determination of Priorities and to Set Aside Consent Order; Judgment on Applications
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's application for determination of priorities and payment out (encl. 438) allowed; 2nd Defendant's application (encl. 433) dismissed; 1st Defendant's application (encl. 489) dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Lien, Priority of Claims, Sale Proceeds of Ship, Consent Order Set Aside, Stay of Proceedings, Winding Up, Enforcement of Judgment
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dan-Bunkering (Singapore) Pte Ltd
Plaintiff
The Owners of the Ship or Vessel "PDZ MEWAH"; Perkapalan Dai Zhun Sdn Bhd (In Liquidation)
1st Defendant
Perkapalan Dai Zhun Sdn Bhd (In Liquidation)
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Admiralty in Rem Action / Post Trial Applications for Determination of Priorities and to Set Aside Consent Order; Judgment on Applications
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff as statutory lienholder is entitled to the proceeds of sale despite subsequent change of beneficial ownership and liquidation of the owner
- 2 Whether sale proceeds must be distributed by the liquidator under Companies Act 2016 s.527
- 3 Whether the consent order authorising sale was void or should be set aside for mistake, lack of consent or other vitiating factor
Ratio Decidendi
Because the plaintiff issued the writ in rem and obtained a statutory lien before the defendant company was wound up, the plaintiff ranked as a secured creditor entitled to realise the vessel and have the sale proceeds applied to its claim; the consent order was validly entered with representation and did not extinguish the plaintiff's lien; accordingly plaintiff's O.70 r.21 application for determination of priorities and payment out succeeded and defendants' applications to set aside the consent order or for return of proceeds were dismissed.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's application for determination of priorities and payment out (encl. 438) allowed; 2nd Defendant's application (encl. 433) dismissed; 1st Defendant's application (encl. 489) dismissed.
Orders
- Enclosure 438 allowed with costs to the Plaintiff of RM3,000.00 to be paid by each defendant
- Enclosure 433 dismissed with costs to the Plaintiff of RM3,000.00 to be paid by each defendant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment