1. ) DATO SERI YAP SENG YEW 2. ) DATIN SERI GAN LI LI 1. ) EXPO ELECTRONICS SDN BHD 2. ) CEKAP ASIA SDN BHD 3. ) ABU BAKAR BIN AHMAD 4. ) SYED NAGIFF BIN SYED MOKHTAR 5. ) LIM LITT 6. ) HENG JI KENG 7. ) Suruhanjaya Syarikat Malaysia (SSM)
Court held plaintiffs proved that Expo, its liquidators and associated solicitors deliberately concealed the prior binding judgment of Suraya Othman J and material facts in the s.555 reinstatement application, conduct which amounted to conscious and deliberate dishonesty that was material and causative of the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- WA-22NCC-591-11/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Dato Seri' Yap Seng Yew; Plaintiff: Datin Seri' Gan Li Li; Defendant: Expo Electronics Sdn Bhd; Defendant: Cekap Asia Sdn Bhd; Defendant: Abu Bakar bin Ahmad; Defendant: Syed Nagiff bin Syed Mokhtar; Defendant: Lim Litt; Defendant: Heng Ji Keng; Defendant: Suruhanjaya Syarikat Malaysia
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 22 April 2025
- Case Number
- WA-22NCC-591-11/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit (company/fraud) / Judgment Issued (decision)
- Outcome
- Judgment for Plaintiffs; Court Order dated 28-6-2018 set aside in its entirety; declaratory, restorative and monetary reliefs granted to plaintiffs
- Legal Topics
- Setting Aside Judgment for Fraud, Res Judicata and Abuse of Process, Section 555 Companies Act Reinstatement, Forgery of Corporate Documents, Duties of Liquidators, Exemplary Damages, Rectification of Company Register
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dato Seri' Yap Seng Yew
Plaintiff
Datin Seri' Gan Li Li
Plaintiff
Expo Electronics Sdn Bhd
Defendant
Cekap Asia Sdn Bhd
Defendant
Abu Bakar bin Ahmad
Defendant
Syed Nagiff bin Syed Mokhtar
Defendant
Lim Litt
Defendant
Heng Ji Keng
Defendant
Suruhanjaya Syarikat Malaysia
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit (company/fraud) / Judgment Issued (decision)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether plaintiffs are barred by res judicata/issue estoppel/abuse of process from challenging reinstatement order dated 28-6-2018
- 2 Whether the Originating Summons WA-24NCC-131-03/2018 and the resulting order were obtained by fraud or material non-disclosure
- 3 Whether signatures/resolutions relied upon to remove plaintiffs and appoint new directors/secretary were forged
Ratio Decidendi
Court held plaintiffs proved that Expo, its liquidators and associated solicitors deliberately concealed the prior binding judgment of Suraya Othman J and material facts in the s.555 reinstatement application, conduct which amounted to conscious and deliberate dishonesty that was material and causative of the reinstatement order dated 28-6-2018; forged signatures were proven; accordingly the reinstatement order was set aside, related appointments/transfers and post-reinstatement acts were declared void, plaintiffs' corporate status and registers were to be restored to pre-reinstatement state, and exemplary damages and costs were awarded against responsible defendants.
Court Disposition
Judgment for Plaintiffs; Court Order dated 28-6-2018 set aside in its entirety; declaratory, restorative and monetary reliefs granted to plaintiffs
Orders
- Set aside and impeach the Kuala Lumpur High Court Order dated 28-6-2018 (Originating Summons No WA-24NCC-131-03/2018)
- Set aside the appointment of Abu Bakar bin Ahmad and Syed Nagiff bin Syed Mokhtar as directors of Cekap Asia Sdn Bhd
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment