Perbadanan Pengurusan Sunrise Garden Kondominium 1. Sunway City (Penang) Sdn Bhd 2. Majlis Bandaraya Pulau Pinang 3. Lembaga Rayuan Negeri Pulau Pinang
The Court held the SPC Guidelines were valid directions under section 4(5) TCPA, Category 2 of the Guidelines must be read disjunctively (subparagraph (c) stands alone to cover sites zoned for housing under the local Pelan Dasar), MBPP properly relied on JPBD confirmation and statutory approvals (EIA, JKR) and therefore lawfully granted planning permission; the Penang State Appeal Board misinterpreted the Guidelines, exceeded its jurisdiction and its decision was quashed by the High Court and that quashing was upheld on appeal.
- Citation
- P-01(A)-222-07/2017 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Parties
- Appellant/perayu: Perbadanan Pengurusan Sunrise Garden Kondominium; Applicant/pemohon: Sunway City (Penang) Sdn Bhd; Local Planning Authority/second Respondent: Majlis Bandaraya Pulau Pinang; State Appeal Board/third Respondent: Lembaga Rayuan Negeri Pulau Pinang; Appellant/perayu: Ong Ah Baa @ Ong Chow Sin; Appellant/perayu: Goh Lian Siah; Appellant/perayu: Chuah Kok Seng; Appellants/perayu Perayu: Sim Khoo Tneah Seng & Goon Swee Keng
- Court
- A
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 26 March 2019
- Case Number
- P-01(A)-222-07/2017 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review of Planning Decision / Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment (appeal Dismissed)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; High Court order granting judicial review and quashing the Penang State Appeal Board decision affirmed
- Legal Topics
- Delegation of Power, Structure Plan Interpretation, Planning Permission, Legitimate Expectation, Wednesbury Unreasonableness, Judicial Review, Scope of Appeal to Planning Appeal Board
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Perbadanan Pengurusan Sunrise Garden Kondominium
Appellant/perayu
Sunway City (Penang) Sdn Bhd
Applicant/pemohon
Majlis Bandaraya Pulau Pinang
Local Planning Authority/second Respondent
Lembaga Rayuan Negeri Pulau Pinang
State Appeal Board/third Respondent
Ong Ah Baa @ Ong Chow Sin
Appellant/perayu
Goh Lian Siah
Appellant/perayu
Chuah Kok Seng
Appellant/perayu
Sim Khoo Tneah Seng & Goon Swee Keng
Appellants/perayu Perayu
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review of Planning Decision / Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment (appeal Dismissed)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the State Planning Committee (SPC) Guidelines lawfully permit local authority to determine projek istimewa without SPC referral
- 2 Whether Category 2 of SPC Guidelines must be read conjunctively or disjunctively and whether the applicant’s site qualifies as 'projek istimewa'
- 3 Whether SPC purportedly delegated non-delegable powers to Majlis Bandaraya Pulau Pinang contrary to TPCA
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held the SPC Guidelines were valid directions under section 4(5) TCPA, Category 2 of the Guidelines must be read disjunctively (subparagraph (c) stands alone to cover sites zoned for housing under the local Pelan Dasar), MBPP properly relied on JPBD confirmation and statutory approvals (EIA, JKR) and therefore lawfully granted planning permission; the Penang State Appeal Board misinterpreted the Guidelines, exceeded its jurisdiction and its decision was quashed by the High Court and that quashing was upheld on appeal.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; High Court order granting judicial review and quashing the Penang State Appeal Board decision affirmed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- High Court order granting judicial review and quashing Penang State Appeal Board decision (LR/PP/11/2012 and related appeals) is affirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment