URBAN DOMAIN SDN. BHD. 1. ) PINS OSC & MAINTENANCE SERVICES SDN BHD 2. ) PERAK INTEGRATED NETWORK SERVICES SDN BHD 3. ) XXXX
The Court of Appeal held that the Liability Judgment and clause 8.1.1 fix the accounting period by reference to the last Work Order and that a subsequent winding‑up of PINS OSC could not be used to shorten the period of PINS’s contractual liability; accordingly the Registrar’s Order was reinstated and the High Court’s amendment setting the period to the winding‑up date was set aside; separately, the High Court’s Quantum Order was correct to permit deduction only for MCMC Priority Payments and was affirmed.
- Citation
- W-03(IM)(NCC)-70-07/2022 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Parties
- Appellant (derivative Plaintiff): Urban Domain Sdn Bhd; Respondent/appellant: Perak Integrated Network Services Sdn Bhd; First Defendant / Company on Whose Behalf Derivative Action Brought: PINS OSC & Maintenance Services Sdn Bhd; Third Defendant: Dato’ Seri Dr. Abdullah Fadzil Che Wan
- Court
- IM
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 7 December 2023
- Case Number
- W-03(IM)(NCC)-70-07/2022 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeals (derivative Action; Account and Inquiry; Quantum) / Court of Appeal Judgment (final Disposition of Appeals)
- Outcome
- Appeals W-03(IM)(NCC)-69-07/2022 and W-03(IM)(NCC)-70-07/2022 allowed; 1st Judge's Order set aside; Registrar's Order reinstated with requested amendments; Appeal W-02(IM)(NCC)-326-03/2023 dismissed and Quantum Order affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Derivative Action, Account and Inquiry, Winding Up, Calculation of Damages, Res Judicata, Interpretation of Court Orders
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Urban Domain Sdn Bhd
Appellant (derivative Plaintiff)
Perak Integrated Network Services Sdn Bhd
Respondent/appellant
PINS OSC & Maintenance Services Sdn Bhd
First Defendant / Company on Whose Behalf Derivative Action Brought
Dato’ Seri Dr. Abdullah Fadzil Che Wan
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeals (derivative Action; Account and Inquiry; Quantum) / Court of Appeal Judgment (final Disposition of Appeals)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the winding‑up of PINS OSC post‑trial limited the period for which maintenance fees could be recovered
- 2 Whether the Registrar’s Order determining the accounting period was correct
- 3 Whether deductions other than MCMC Priority Payments were allowable in the quantum calculation
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal held that the Liability Judgment and clause 8.1.1 fix the accounting period by reference to the last Work Order and that a subsequent winding‑up of PINS OSC could not be used to shorten the period of PINS’s contractual liability; accordingly the Registrar’s Order was reinstated and the High Court’s amendment setting the period to the winding‑up date was set aside; separately, the High Court’s Quantum Order was correct to permit deduction only for MCMC Priority Payments and was affirmed.
Court Disposition
Appeals W-03(IM)(NCC)-69-07/2022 and W-03(IM)(NCC)-70-07/2022 allowed; 1st Judge's Order set aside; Registrar's Order reinstated with requested amendments; Appeal W-02(IM)(NCC)-326-03/2023 dismissed and Quantum Order affirmed.
Orders
- 1st Judge's Order dated 10.6.2022 set aside
- Registrar's Order dated 6.8.2021 reinstated and amended to include plaintiff's requests in enclosure 246
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment