XXXX 1. ) GOMBAK MEDICAL CENTRE SDN. BHD. 2. ) DR NOOR FIDAK BINTI SAMSUDIN 3. ) DR ZANA ZALINDA BINTI S MOHD GHAZALI
The Court held that the person in charge of a private obstetric facility owes a direct duty of care to patients to ensure timely access to necessary specialists (including neonatal paediatricians/anaesthetists); the first and second respondents breached that duty by failing to have neonatal paediatric care available and by unacceptably delaying transfer to a NICU, and that breach materially contributed to the plaintiff's hypoxic injury and consequent cerebral palsy; the delivering doctor (third respondent) was not negligent; appeal allowed against first and second respondents and dismissed against third; matter remitted to High Court to assess damages.
- Citation
- W-02(NCvC)(W)-1327-08/2024 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Parties
- Appellant (plaintiff): Nur Fuziatun binti Mohd Fadzli; First Respondent (defendant): Gombak Medical Centre Sdn Bhd; Second Respondent (defendant): Dr Noor Fidak binti Samsudin; Third Respondent (defendant): Dr Zana Zalinda S Mohd Ghazali
- Court
- NCvC
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 12 November 2025
- Case Number
- W-02(NCvC)(W)-1327-08/2024 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Procedural Posture
- Medical Negligence Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment (appeal Allowed in Part)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; appeal against first and second respondents allowed; appeal against third respondent dismissed; case remitted to High Court for assessment of damages
- Legal Topics
- Duty of Care, Causation, Breach of Statutory/regulatory Standards, Judicial Notice, Expert Evidence
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nur Fuziatun binti Mohd Fadzli
Appellant (plaintiff)
Gombak Medical Centre Sdn Bhd
First Respondent (defendant)
Dr Noor Fidak binti Samsudin
Second Respondent (defendant)
Dr Zana Zalinda S Mohd Ghazali
Third Respondent (defendant)
Procedural Posture
Medical Negligence Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment (appeal Allowed in Part)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the person in charge of a private healthcare facility owes a direct tortious duty of care to patients
- 2 Whether a private hospital providing obstetric services must ensure availability or timely access to specialist paediatric/neonatal care
- 3 Whether there was breach by defendants in failing to have paediatrician on standby and in delay of transfer to NICU
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that the person in charge of a private obstetric facility owes a direct duty of care to patients to ensure timely access to necessary specialists (including neonatal paediatricians/anaesthetists); the first and second respondents breached that duty by failing to have neonatal paediatric care available and by unacceptably delaying transfer to a NICU, and that breach materially contributed to the plaintiff's hypoxic injury and consequent cerebral palsy; the delivering doctor (third respondent) was not negligent; appeal allowed against first and second respondents and dismissed against third; matter remitted to High Court to assess damages.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; appeal against first and second respondents allowed; appeal against third respondent dismissed; case remitted to High Court for assessment of damages
Orders
- Allow appeal against first and second respondents and dismiss appeal against third respondent
- Remit case to High Court to assess damages before another High Court judge
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment