EMEYUSREZAL BIN DAUD (NO. K/P: 800415-01-5577) 1. MUHAINI BINTI MUHAMAD (NO. K/P: 640913-03-5204) 2. ORANG-ORANG YANG MENIKMATI PENGGUNAAN HARTANAH YANG DIKENALI SEBAGAI GM 282 LOT 4033 MUKIM TIONG KG. TEBU, DARAH PENDEK, JAJAHAN KOTA BHARU

EMEYUSREZAL BIN DAUD (NO. K/P: 800415-01-5577) 1. MUHAINI BINTI MUHAMAD (NO. K/P: 640913-03-5204) 2. ORANG-ORANG YANG MENIKMATI PENGGUNAAN HARTANAH YANG DIKENALI SEBAGAI GM 282 LOT 4033 MUKIM TIONG KG. TEBU, DARAH PENDEK, JAJAHAN KOTA BHARU

The judgment in default was regularly obtained by proper service; the first defendant failed to produce or particularize any prima facie meritorious defence or credible evidence to rebut service; accordingly the application to set aside the JID is dismissed and the JID stands, with costs awarded to the plaintiff.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
DA-22NCVC-30-07/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Parties
Plaintiff: EMEYUSREZAL BIN DAUD; Defendant: MUHAINI BINTI MUHAMAD; Defendant: ORANG-ORANG YANG MENIKMATI PENGGUNAAN HARTANAH YANG DIKENALI SEBAGAI GM 282 LOT 4033 MUKIM TIONG KG. TEBU, DARAH PENDEK, JAJAHAN KOTA BHARU, KELANTAN
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Malaysia
Judgment Date
5 October 2021
Case Number
DA-22NCVC-30-07/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Procedural Posture
Civil Claim (possession/demolition) / Application to Set Aside Judgment in Default (o.42 R.3)
Outcome
Application dismissed; judgment in default stands
Legal Topics
Setting Aside Judgment in Default, Service of Process, Res Judicata, Leave to File Out of Time, Merits of Defence
Civil Procedure Property Law Land Law Setting Aside Judgment in Default Service of Process Res Judicata Leave to File Out of Time Merits of Defence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

EMEYUSREZAL BIN DAUD

Plaintiff

MUHAINI BINTI MUHAMAD

Defendant

ORANG-ORANG YANG MENIKMATI PENGGUNAAN HARTANAH YANG DIKENALI SEBAGAI GM 282 LOT 4033 MUKIM TIONG KG. TEBU, DARAH PENDEK, JAJAHAN KOTA BHARU, KELANTAN

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Claim (possession/demolition) / Application to Set Aside Judgment in Default (o.42 R.3)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the judgment in default was regularly obtained
  2. 2 Whether the writ and statement of claim were valid in view of prior struck-out action
  3. 3 Whether service of process on the first defendant was properly effected

Ratio Decidendi

The judgment in default was regularly obtained by proper service; the first defendant failed to produce or particularize any prima facie meritorious defence or credible evidence to rebut service; accordingly the application to set aside the JID is dismissed and the JID stands, with costs awarded to the plaintiff.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed; judgment in default stands

Orders

  • Application dismissed
  • Costs awarded to Plaintiff in the sum of RM2,000.00 subject to allocator fee