1. ) Mohd Suhairi Bin Alias (Seorang Yang Kurang Upaya Dan Membawa Tindakan Ini Melalui Ibu Yang Sah Danwakil Litigasi Beliau Iaitu /pencelah Kedua) 2. ) Rasmawati Binti Yaacob 1. ) TUNE INSURANCE MALAYSIA BERHAD 2. ) TUAN SOM BINTI TUAN KA
The Court held that the High Court correctly found as a fact the accident occurred before the policy was issued and that coverage commences from the time of issuance as stated in the cover note; consequently the insurer was entitled to a declaration under s.96(3) RTA that the policy did not cover the accident. Originating summons was the proper procedure because there was no triable dispute of fact on the critical timing issue. Arguments on waiver, uberrima fides and Article 8 discrimination were rejected.
- Citation
- W-02(NCC)(A)-1160-06/2021 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Parties
- First Appellant (disabled; Represented by Litigation Representative): MOHD SUHAIRI BIN ALIAS; Second Appellant (litigation Representative/mother): RASMAWATI BINTI YAACOB; First Respondent (insurer): TUNE INSURANCE MALAYSIA BERHAD; Second Respondent (registered Owner of Car): TUAN SOM BINTI TUAN KADIR; Third Respondent (driver/defendant in Original Suit): ZURINA BINTI OTHMAN
- Court
- NCC
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 13 January 2025
- Case Number
- W-02(NCC)(A)-1160-06/2021 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (court of Appeal) / Judgment (determination of Appeal From High Court Decision Granting S.96(3) Declaration)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; High Court decision affirmed
- Legal Topics
- Enforceability of Motor Insurance Policy, Section 96(3) Road Transport Act 1987, Commencement/time of Cover (cover Note), Originating Summons Vs Trial/triable Issues, Utmost Good Faith/uberrima Fides and Disclosure (fsa Schedule 9), Waiver, Equality Under Article 8 Federal Constitution
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MOHD SUHAIRI BIN ALIAS
First Appellant (disabled; Represented by Litigation Representative)
RASMAWATI BINTI YAACOB
Second Appellant (litigation Representative/mother)
TUNE INSURANCE MALAYSIA BERHAD
First Respondent (insurer)
TUAN SOM BINTI TUAN KADIR
Second Respondent (registered Owner of Car)
ZURINA BINTI OTHMAN
Third Respondent (driver/defendant in Original Suit)
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (court of Appeal) / Judgment (determination of Appeal From High Court Decision Granting S.96(3) Declaration)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether originating summons was the proper mode for s.96(3) declaration
- 2 Whether triable issues existed making originating summons inappropriate
- 3 Whether the insurance policy was in force at the time of the accident (time of commencement of cover)
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that the High Court correctly found as a fact the accident occurred before the policy was issued and that coverage commences from the time of issuance as stated in the cover note; consequently the insurer was entitled to a declaration under s.96(3) RTA that the policy did not cover the accident. Originating summons was the proper procedure because there was no triable dispute of fact on the critical timing issue. Arguments on waiver, uberrima fides and Article 8 discrimination were rejected.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; High Court decision affirmed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Costs of RM5000.00 to be paid by the appellants subject to allocatur
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment